Epilobium hirsutum L.

Common Name: Hairy willow herb

Synonyms and Other Names:

Great hairy willow-herb, hairy willowherb, hairy willow herb, codlins and cream, European fireweed, fiddle grass

Pethan Utrecht (commons.wikimedia.org)Copyright Info

Identification: Semi-aquatic, softly-hairy herb. The overall plant is covered with fine soft hairs. The leaf arrangement is mostly opposite, and the toothed leaves are lanceolate shaped (much longer than wide, and widest below the middle). The showy rose-purple flowers extend from leaf axils near the top of the plant. Flowers are approximately ¾ inch across. Each flower has four sepals, four notched petals and eight stamens.  Flowering occurs in July and August.

Similar species: E. angustifolium L. (fireweed, great willow-herb). E. angustifolium differs from E. hirsutum in that its leaves are longer, measuring 15-20 cm (6-8 in.), and that it does not have pubescent leaves.

Size: up to 6 feet

Native Range: Eurasia and North Africa

Map Key
This map only depicts Great Lakes introductions.

Great Lakes Nonindigenous Occurrences: Records indicate that hairy willow-herb is established in the northeastern United States, with initial sites reported 140 years ago. The earliest record of E. hirsutum in the northeast U.S. is from Newport, Rhode Island in 1829. After this date there is a gap until the 1850s and 1860s when it was reported in a number of sites along the northeastern seaboard (Stuckey 1970). The first Great Lakes sighting was in 1874 in Lake Ontario.

Epilobium hirsutum is present and considered exotic in Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec (Biota of North America Program 2011). It continues to expand westward.

Table 1. Great Lakes region nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Epilobium hirsutum are found here.

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
IN197219881Little Calumet-Galien
MI1943201432Betsie-Platte; Black-Macatawa; Boardman-Charlevoix; Brevoort-Millecoquins; Cass; Cheboygan; Detroit; Flint; Great Lakes Region; Huron; Kalamazoo; Kawkawlin-Pine; Lake Erie; Lake Huron; Lake Michigan; Little Calumet-Galien; Lower Grand; Muskegon; Northeastern Lake Michigan; Northwestern Lake Huron; Ottawa-Stony; Pere Marquette-White; Pigeon-Wiscoggin; Raisin; Saginaw; Saginaw; Shiawassee; Southeastern Lake Michigan; Southwestern Lake Huron; St. Joseph; Thornapple; Western Lake Erie
NY1874200810Cattaraugus; Eastern Lake Erie; Great Lakes Region; Lake Ontario; Northeastern Lake Ontario; Oneida; Oswego; Oswego; Seneca; Southwestern Lake Ontario
OH200820085Black-Rocky; Cuyahoga; Lake Erie; Southern Lake Erie; Western Lake Erie
PA200820081Lake Erie
WI200820083Manitowoc-Sheboygan; Northwestern Lake Michigan; Southwestern Lake Michigan

Table last updated 1/20/2022

† Populations may not be currently present.

* HUCs are not listed for areas where the observation(s) cannot be approximated to a HUC (e.g. state centroids or Canadian provinces).

Ecology: Epilobium hirsutum is a perennial, typically found in unshaded, moist soils as in wetlands, ditches, low-lying areas, and along streams (Shamsi and Whitehead 1974, State of Washington 2012). Great hairy willow herb can often be found growing in the same invasive areas as another common invasive, Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) (Shamsi and Whitehead 1974, Shamsi and Whitehead 1977). It is capable of reproducing via seeds or rhizomes. Seedlings develop flower buds after 10 to 12 weeks of growth and bloom by mid-summer (July–August) (State of Washington 2012). Each great hairy willow herb plant can produce up to 70,000 seeds (Shamsi and Whitehead 1977). Self-pollination is possible, but seed production is reduced (State of Washington 2012). Each seed is oblong and flattened, with a tuft of long white hairs that aids in wind dispersal (Shamsi and Whitehead 1977). However, Thompson and Grime (1979) found a high concentration of seeds near the parent plants. Seeds begin to disperse 4 to 6 weeks after flowering and can remain viable for several years (Shamsi and Whitehead 1977, State of Washington 2012). Seeds require a soil pH for 5.5 or higher for germination (State of Washington 2012).

Epilobium hirsutum is also capable of spreading through vegetative means. At the base of the stem are axillary bubs that produce stolons. Stolons produced below the soil develop into rhizomes that can reach up to 2 feet in length. Stolons produced above ground sprout a pseudo-rosette of leaves that, if separated, will produce an aerial shoot and develop into a new plant (State of Washington 2012). Above-ground stolons can grow up to 0.5 meters (Shamsi and Whitehead 1977) before dying back in the fall.

Epilobium hirsutum is able to survive water fluctuations (State of Washington 2012). When roots are submerged or waterlogged, rhizomes develop arenchyma tissue to enable easier exchange of oxygen between the roots and the aboveground parts of the plant (King County 2008, State of Washington 2012). Within a few days of flooding, wild E. hirsutum may grow adventitious roots and display stem hypertrophy (Etherington 1984).

In observations by Nazrul-Islam (1986), E. hirsutum grew best in calcareous waterlogged soils with a pH of 6.5, poorly in non-calcareous soil with a pH of 5.9, and died in acidic soils with a pH range of 3.8 — 4.5. When grown in a nutrient solution, this species responded best to conditions of high calcium (40 mg/liter) and low manganese (0.05 mg/liter). Epilobium hirsutum displayed toxicity symptoms when exposed to a manganese level of 5 mg/liter (Nazrul-Islam 1986).

In nature surveys of the British Isles, E. hirsutum was confined to the less iron-rich soils. Epilobium hirsutum seedlings grown in soils with iron concentrations greater than 50 mg/L showed poor growth and ill health due to blackening, flaccidity, and necrosis of roots, and ultimately died (Wheeler et al. 1985).

Means of Introduction: This species was known as a garden ornamental, a garden weed, and as a species that grew in ballast areas. The records from the 50s and 60s suggest that it may have been brought to the U.S. in ship ballast. Alternatively, early records from the northeastern seaboard indicate that hairy willow-herb originated as a garden ornamental, and as a weed in cultivated gardens. It was sold as a garden seed (Stuckey 1970) and therefore its introduction could have constituted an unintentional release (USEPA 2008).  After its arrival in coastal areas, it spread inland at a fairly rapid pace.

Status: Established

Great Lakes Impacts:  

Epilobium hirsutum has a moderate environmental impact in the Great Lakes.

Once established, great hairy willow herb can spread into neighboring undisturbed habitats, such as meadows (State of Washington 2012). Shamsi and Whitehead (1977) determined that this species can germinate and grow under conditions of low temperatures and short days; furthermore, due to its growth form and pattern of vegetative reproduction, it can rapidly exploit available space. The persistent nature of great hairy willow herb enables it to form monospecific populations that exclude other, especially native, species (Shamsi and Whitehead 1974). Dense stands of E. hirsutum impede hydrology in waterways and wetlands (King County 2008, State of Washington 2012).

A joint survey conducted by the Invasive Plant Associate of Wisconsin (IPAW) and the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) found that this species has a limited distribution on ecologically vulnerable sites. In the sites where it does establish, it is a moderate competitor and has a moderate to high impact (Reinartz 2003).

Epilobium hirsutum could be a competitive threat to native species in Ohio, including E. angustifolium (state endangered) and E. strictum (state threatened) (OHDNR 2012). A few occurrences of hybridization between E. hirsutum and E. ciliatum, a native to the Great Lakes and other parts of North America, have been found in Europe, resulting in E. x novae-civitatis (Online Atlas 2012). No such hybridization has been reported in the Great Lakes.

In Washington state, great hairy willow herb disrupts wetland food chains (State of Washington 2012).

There is little or no evidence to support that Epilobium hirsutum has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes.

There is little or no evidence to support that Epilobium hirsutum has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes.

Epilobium hirsutum L. is considered a medical plant in Bulgaria (Ivancheva et al. 1992). Ethanolic extracts of E. hirsutum have antimicrobial properties (Battinelli et al. 2001). Methanolic extracts of E. hirsutum exhibited antinociceptive activity in mice. Doses of 500 mg/kg resulted in higher pain tolerance than doses of diclofenac (50 mg/kg) and morphine (5 mg/kg). Furthermore, doses of the methanolic extract (200-500 mg/kg) did not impair locomotors skills of mice (Pourmorad et al. 2007). A polyphenolic mixture of E. hirsutum (combined with a water-alcohol extract) had a significant inhibitory effect on the reproduction of influenza viruses (Ivancheva et al. 1992). A few of the polyphenols extracted—galloylglucose and monomeric and dimeric ellagitannins—are important compounds for the treatment of prostate cancer (Cristea et al. 2009). Initial experiments of alcohol extracts from E. hirsutum indicate other anti-tumor properties. Small doses of alcohol extract (1-3 mg/kg) prolonged the lifespan of mice with tumors by over 150% (Voynova et al. 1991).

Epilobium hirsutum can co-exist with Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) along riparian areas created by erosion. Great hairy willow herb outcompetes and grows faster than purple loosestrife in the shorter days and colder temperatures of autumn. In the spring, this relationship is reversed, with purple loosestrife having a faster growth rate (Shamsi and Whitehead 1974, Shamsi and Whitehead 1977).

Flavonoids (3-O-glycosides of quercetin, myricetin, and kaempferol) and a macrocircular dimeric ellagitannin oenothein D have been detected in dried fragments of E. hirsutum (Strgulc Krajšek et al. 2011). Increased intake of total flavonols is associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer, with kaempferol linked to greatest reduction in risk (Nöthlings et al. 2007). In epidemiological studies, quercetin supplements reduced blood pressure in hypertensive rodents. Quercetin is thought to be linked with lowering the risk of coronary heart disease and/or stroke (Edwards et al. 2007).

Management: Regulations (pertaining to the Great Lakes region)

Great hairy willow herb is ranked as having “moderate environmental invasiveness” by the New York State Office of Invasive Species and is considered “well-established” by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (New York 2010, Ohio Division and Nature Conservancy 2000). The transportation, translocation, or introduction of E. hirsutum is prohibited in Wisconsin, except in Kenosha County (Burea of Plant Industry 2012). Epilobium hirsutum is listed as an introduced species in Ontario (Canadensys 2012). Regionally, the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) classifies this species as capable of causing moderate to severe ecological impacts and/or having limited effective control options available.

Note: Check federal, state/provincial, and local regulations for the most up-to-date information.

Given the invasive nature of E. hirsutum, control methods need to be applied and monitored for several years to be effective (King County 2008). For localized infestations, the GLIFWC recommends E. hirsutum “be controlled immediately upon detection before it becomes established and spreads” (Falck and Garske 2003).

Elephant moth (Deilephila elpenor) feeds on Epilobium, but is not a native to the Great Lakes (Hoskins 2012, Pittaway 2012). Genetic material extracted from E. hirsutum individuals displaying phyllody of flowers and/or plant yellowing revealed infection by epilobium phyllody (EpPh) phytoplasma, an obligate, parasitic bacteria that attach to phloem tissue (Alminaite et al. 2002). The ability of this phytoplasma to act as a biocontrol agent is still unknown. Additional insects that feed on and/or use E. hirsutum for part of their life cycle are listed on the website of J. Lindsey (http://www.commanster.eu/commanster/Plants/Flowers/SuFlowers/Epilobium.hirsutum.html).

Small populations of E. hirsutum can be hand-dug, placed into plastic bags, and disposed of in the trash (King County 2008). When hand-digging, one should be sure to remove as many of the root pieces as possible because rhizomes left in the soil can generate new plants (Campbell et al. 2010, King County 2008). Mowing or cutting of mature plants will not kill the plant, but flowering stems can be cut in late summer or early fall to prevent seed production and dispersal (King County 2008).

After 18 weeks in waterlogged and flooded conditions, Lenseen et al. (2000) found E. hirsutum populations only achieved 82% and 54%, respectively, of the mean biomass growth as populations in drained conditions. Furthermore, it was determined that flooded individuals experienced reduced rhizomal growth in terms of numbers, size, and biomass (Lenssen et al. 2000). Growth of waterlogged plants was further limited by pruning adventitious roots. This procedure reduced the depth of the plant’s primary root system and made individuals more susceptible to uprooting by various environmental conditions (flooding, wind, etc.) (Etherington 1984). Both of these experimental insights suggest that combined water level manipulation and root pruning may be beneficial to the control of E. hirsutum.

Due to the regenerative nature of rhizomes, composting plant material off-site is not recommended (King County 2008).

Epilobium hirsutum populations treated with Patron 170 are typically susceptible to severe injury or death. It should be noted that this pesticide is currently prohibited by from use on Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) land (WIDNR 2011). Under dry conditions, 2,4-D will control great hairy willow-herb (Evans et al. 2003). In moist or aquatic locations, glyphosate will stress or kill above-ground portions of the plant, but the root system will remain intact and plants will recover (Evans et al. 2003).

Note: Check state/provincial and local regulations for the most up-to-date information regarding permits for herbicide use. Follow all label directions.

Remarks: Indiana Department of Natural Resources also refers to Epilobium ciliatum as hairy willow-herb.

References: (click for full references)

Alminaite, A., D. Valinunas, and R. Jomantiene. 2002. First report of a Group 16SrI, Subgroup B, phytoplasma in diseased Epilobium hirsutum in the region of Tallin, Estonia. Plant Disease (The American Phytopathological Society) 86(10): 1177.

Battinelli, L., B. Tita, M.G. Evandri, and G. Mazzanti. 2001. Antimicrobial activity of Epilobium spp. extracts. Farmaco (Società chimica italiana) 56(5—7): 345—348.

Bureau of Plant Industry. 2012. Summary of Plant Protection Regulations: Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection. Madison, WI. 12 pp.

Campbell, S., P. Higman, B. Slaughter, and E. Schools. 2010. A Field Guide to Invasive Plants of Aquatic and Wetland Habitats for Michigan. Michigan DNRE, Michigan State University Extension, Michigan Natural Features Inventory. 90 pp.

Canadensys. 2012. Epilobium hirsutum. Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centre. Available http://data.canadensys.net/vascan/taxon/6776. Accessed 17 May 2012.

Cristea, V., C. Deliu, B. Oltean, A. Butiuc-Keul, A. Brummer, C. Albu, and G.L. Radu. 2009. Soilless culture for pharmaceutical use and biodiversity conservation. Acta Horticulturae (International Society for Horticultural Science) 843: 157—164.

Department of Ecology, Washington State. 2008. Non-Native Freshwater Plants. Available   http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/plants/weeds/. Accessed 17 May 2012.

Edwards, R.L., T. Lyon, S.E. Litwin, A. Rabovsky, J.D. Symons, and T. Jalili. 2007. Quercetin reduces blood pressure in hypertensive subjects. The Journal of Nutrition: 2405—2411.

Etherington, J.R. 1984. Comparative studies of plant growth and distribution in relation to waterlogging: X. Differential formation of adventitious roots and their experimental excision in Epilobium hirsutum and Chamerion angustifolium. Journal of Ecology 72(2): 389 — 404.

Evans, J.R., J.J. Nugent, and J.K. Meisel. 2003. Invasive Plant Species Inventory and Management Plan for the Hanford Reach National Monument. The Nature Conservancy of Washington, Seattle, WA. 198 pp.

Falck, M., and S. Garske. 2003. Invasive Non-native Plant Management During 2002. Administrative Report 02-12. Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC), Odanah, WI. 68 pp.

Hoskins, A. 2012. Elephant Hawkmoth Deilephila elpenor. Moths of Britain and Europe. Available http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Britain%20-%20Deilephila%20elpenor.htm. Accessed 23 May 2012.

Ivancheva, S., N. Manolova, J. Serkedjieva, V. Dimov, and N. Ivanovska. 1992. Polyphenols from Bulgarian medicinal plants with anti-infectious activity. Basic Life Sciences 59: 717—728.

Kartesz, J.T., and the Biota of North America Program (BONAP). 2011. North American Plant Atlas. Available http://www.bonap.org/MapSwitchboard.html. Accessed 15 May 2012.

King County Noxious Weed Control Program. 2008. Hairy Willowherb. King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Water and Land Resources Division. 2 pp.

Lenssen, J.P.M., F.B.J. Menting, W.H. Van Der Putten, and C.W.P.M. Blom. 2000. Vegetative reproduction by species with different adaptation to shallow-flooded habitats. New Phytologist 145(1): 61—70.

Nazrul-Islam, A.K.M. 1986. Effects of interaction of calcium and manganese on the growth and nutrition of Epilobium hirsutum L. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 32(2): 161—168.

New York Invasive Species Council. 2010. Final report: a regulatory system for non-native species. 131 pp.

Nöthlings, U., S.P. Murphy, L.R. Wilkens, B.E. Henderson, and L.N. Kolonel. 2007. Flavonols and pancreatic cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. American Journal of Epidemiology 166(8): 924—931.

Ohio Department of Natural Resources (OHDNR). 2012. Rare native Ohio plants 2010-2011 Status List. Available http://dnr.state.oh.us/Home/Rare_Plants/20102011RareNativeOhioPlants/tabid/22557/Default.aspx. Accessed 17 May 2012.

Ohio Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, and The Nature Conservany. 2000. Ohio's Invasive Plant Species. 2 pp.

Online Atlas of the British & Irish Flora. 2012. Epilobium ciliatum x hirsutum (E. x novea-civitatis). Available http://www.brc.ac.uk/plantatlas/index.php?q=plant/unmatched-species-name-366. Accessed 17 May 2012.

Peterson R.T. and M. McKenny. 1996. A field Guide to Wildflowers of Northeastern and North-central North America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, MA.  420 pp

Pittaway, A.R. 2012. Deilephila [Laspeyres], 1809. Sphingidae of the Western Palaearctic. Available http://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/list.htm. Accessed 23 May 2012.

Pourmorad, F., M.A. Ebrahimzadeh, M. Mahmoudi, and S. Yasini. 2007. Antinociceptive activity of methanolic extract of Epilobium hirsutum. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences (Pakistan) 10(16): 2764—2767.

Reinartz, J. (ed). 2003. IPAW working list of the invasive plants of Wisconsin - March 2003: A call for comments and information. Plants Out of Place. Invasive Plants Association of Wisconsin. Saukville, WI. 20 pp.

Shamsi, S.R.A., and F.H. Whitehead. 1974. Comparative eco-physiology of Epilobium hirsutum L. and Lythrum salicaria L.: II. Growth and development in relation to light. Journal of Ecology 62(2): 631—645.

Shamsi, S.R.A., and F.H. Whitehead. 1977. Comparative eco-physiology of Epilobium hirsutum and Lythrum salicaria L.: IV. Effects of temperature and inter-specific competition and concluding discussion. Journal of Ecology 65(1): 71—84.

State of Washington, Department of Ecology. 2012. Hairy Willow-Herb (Epilobium hirsutum). Non-native Invasive Freshwater Plants. Available http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/plants/weeds/willowherb.html. Accessed 14 May 2012.

Strgulc Krajšek, S., S. Kreft, A. Kladnik, K. Drašlar, N. Jogan, and M. Dermastia. 2011. Morphology and glandular activity of unicellular trichomes of Epilobium hirsutum. Biologia Plantarum 55(1): 149—152.

Stuckey, R.L. 1970. Distributional History of Epilobium hirsutum in North America. Rhodora 72: 164—181.

Thompson, K., and J.P. Grime. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed bank of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 67(3): 893—921.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008. Predicting future introductions of nonindigenous species to the Great Lakes. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC. 138 pp.

Voynova, E., S. Dimitrova, E. Naydenova, and P. Karadjov. 1991. Inhibitory action of extracts of Maclura aurantiaca and Epilobium hirsutum on tumor models in mice. Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica 17(4): 50—52.

Wheeler, B.D., M.M. Al-Farraj, and R.E.D. Cook. 1985. Iron toxicity to plants in base-rich wetlands: Comparative effects on the distributions and growth of Epilobium hirsutum L. and Juncus subnodulosus Schrank. New Phytologist 100: 653—669.

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WIDNR); Division of Forestry. 2011. Herbicide Sensitivity Table for Invasive Herbaceous Plants. Madison, WI. 2 pp.

Author: Cao, L., L. Berent, and A. Fusaro

Contributing Agencies:

Revision Date: 10/11/2018

Citation for this information:
Cao, L., L. Berent, and A. Fusaro, 2022, Epilobium hirsutum L.: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/GreatLakes/FactSheet.aspx?NoCache=9%2F7%2F2010+3%3A20%3A36+AM&Species_ID=2678&State=&HUCNumber=DErie, Revision Date: 10/11/2018, Access Date: 1/20/2022

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.