Dactylogyrus amphibothrium Wagener or Wegener, 1857

Common Name: A monogenetic fluke

Synonyms and Other Names:

Copyright Info

Identification: This monogenetic fluke exhibits an anterior adhesive apparatus for attachment to its host. This region is lined with spikes and tegumentary sacs covered in a lining of microvilli (tiny finger-like projections) and some cilia. Dactylogyrids generally are equipped with 7 pairs of hooks and 2–4 eye spots at the anterior end. There are also two pads enclosing glandular organs on the ventral surface of D. amphibothrium that are unique to this species (El-Naggar and Kearn 1980; El-Naggar and Kearn 1983; Post 1983).

At least 14 species of Dactylogyrus are found in Lake Huron, 5 in Lake Superior and 6 in Lake Erie. To date, Dactylogyrus amphibothrium has been found only in Eurasian Ruffe in Lake Superior. Extreme care should be taken with species identification as members of this genus are quite similar.


Size: 0.3–0.7 mm in length and 0.07–0.14 mm in width (Gussev 1985; Wu et al. 2000)


Native Range: This is a Eurasian species (Shulman 1961; U. S. Department of the Interior 1993; Cone et al. 1994).


Map Key
This map only depicts Great Lakes introductions.

 
Great Lakes Nonindigenous Occurrences: First recorded on Eurasian Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) in 1992 in Lake Superior and in a tributary, the St. Louis River.  It probably first arrived in the mid-1980s to the Great Lakes basin (U. S. Department of the Interior 1993; Cone et al. 1994).


Table 1. Great Lakes region nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Dactylogyrus amphibothrium are found here.

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
MN199219921St. Louis

Table last updated 5/1/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.


Ecology: D. amphibothrium is a parasite occurring on gills of fish in the genus Gymnocephalus in Eurasia (Cone et al. 1994).  It has also been recorded on Cobitis aurata bulgarica in the Danube (Kakacheva-Avramova 1977) and on fishes in the genera Leuciscus and Tinca (Gibson et al. 1996).            

In Lake Superior, 5–45 parasites occur per ruffe and are generally found between the secondary lamellae (gill filaments) and halfway along the length of the first lamella (Cone et al. 1994). Attachment often occurs on the upper or dorsal parts of gills to maximize surface area and oxygen flow, while still providing some shelter from the highest water velocities. Individual parasites reach the gills as the fish takes in water, or they affix themselves to the side of the fish and move to the gills independently (Wootten 1974). Most populations of this parasite can overwinter on fish gills (Valtonen et al. 1990).            

Dactyolgyrids are generally oviparous, have no uterus, and only contain one egg at a time in an ootype structure (Post 1983). There is no free-swimming larval stage so young grow to almost adult size inside the parent (El-Naggar and Kearn 1983). In populations in Finland and the former U.S.S.R. this parasite produces 2 generations per year, the first with a life cycle occurring from June to August or September and the second from August or September to May or June. The summer generation lays around 400 eggs and the winter generation lays around 850 eggs. The vast majority of eggs do not survive and maturation of individuals may be linked to increasing water temperature. (Kashkovskii 1982; Valtonen et al. 1990)


Means of Introduction: D. amphibothrium very likely arrived in the Great Lakes basin on Eurasian Ruffe delivered in ballast water (U. S. Department of the Interior 1993; Cone et al. 1994).


Status: Established.


Great Lakes Impacts:
Summary of species impacts derived from literature review. Click on an icon to find out more...

EnvironmentalBeneficial


 

There is little or no evidence to support that Dactylogyrus amphibothrium has significant environmental impacts in the Great Lakes.
Potential:
Dactylogyrus amphibothrium displays host specificity for percids, particularly in the genus Gymnocephalus (Cone et al. 1994); however, outside its native region, it has also been recorded on cyprinids (Gibson et al. 1996, Kakacheva-Avramova 1977). Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) are potentially also at risk for infection by this monogenean parasite, although no such infection has yet been recorded (Cone et al. 1994).

There is little or no evidence to support that Dactylogyrus amphibothrium has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes.

There is little or no evidence to support that Dactylogyrus amphibothrium has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes.
Potential:
In the Great Lakes, D. amphibothrium appears to be host specific to the introduced Eurasian Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) (Cone et al. 1994), infection of which could lead to population reductions. However, no such effects have yet been realized in the Great Lakes.


Management:  

Regulations (pertaining to the Great Lakes)
There are no known regulations for this species.

Note: Check federal, state/provincial, and local regulations for the most up-to-date information.

Control
Biological
Implementation of Eurasian Ruffe management may potentially decrease D. amphibothrium prevalence due to host specificity. However, ruffe management is considered by some (e.g., Ogle 1998) to be difficult and impractical given that the species has developed several adaptations to compensate for high mortality rates (Lind 1977) and populations rebound quickly (Lelek 1987).

Physical
Establishment of quarantines may prevent D. amphibothrium transmission (Reed et al. 1996)

Chemical
Dactylogyrus amphibothrium-specific treatments are unknown. However, multiple chemicals are effective at treating monogenean fluke infections in aquaculture systems. Effective benzimidazoles include levamisole (Buchmann 1997) and praziquantel, which has high efficacy against Dactylogyrus ssp. (Buchmann 1997, Schmahl and Mehlhorn 1985). Effective bath treatments include formaldehyde (30-100 ppm), sodium chloride, copper sulphate, hydrogen peroxide, sodium percarbonate (Buchmann and Kristensen 2003), formalin (25 mg/L for prolonged exposure or 150-250 mg/L for 30 minutes), and potassium permanganate (2 mg/L for prolonged exposure or 10 mg/L for 30 minutes) (Reed et al. 1996). Effective organophsophate bath treatments include metrifonate (0.25-0.5 ppm) and dichlorvos (0.25-0.5 ppm) (Sarig et al. 1965).
Pond infestations can be controlled with formalin (30 mg/L) or trichlorfon (Lepidex®; 0.5 mg/L) (Reed et al. 1996). However, monogenean eggs display chemical resilience and therefore the above chemical treatments are ineffective at destroying eggs (Reed et al. 1996, Rowland et al. 2007). Chemical toxicity varies considerably between monogeneans and fish species. Toxicology and tolerance tests are suggested prior to using anthelmintics (“dewormers”). Managers are encouraged to consider specific host drug tolerance, temperature, salinity, organic material content, and drug retention time prior to treatment (Buchmann and Bresciani 2006). Freshwater fish species can also be dipped in saltwater to minimize external parasite numbers prior to stocking (Reed et al. 1996).

Other
Lampricide TFM may effectively eliminate up to 97% of ruffe, potential carriers of D. amphibothrium, with minimal non-target mortality (Crosier et al. 2012).

Note: Check state/provincial and local regulations for the most up-to-date information regarding permits for control methods. Follow all label instructions.


References (click for full reference list)


Other Resources:
Author: Kipp, R.M., A.K.Bogdanoff, A. Fusaro and R. Sturtevant


Contributing Agencies:
NOAA GLRI Logo


Revision Date: 9/13/2019


Citation for this information:
Kipp, R.M., A.K.Bogdanoff, A. Fusaro and R. Sturtevant, 2024, Dactylogyrus amphibothrium Wagener or Wegener, 1857: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatLakes/FactSheet.aspx?Species_ID=2721&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes, Revision Date: 9/13/2019, Access Date: 5/1/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.