Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium Ergens, 1956

Common Name: A monogenetic fluke

Synonyms and Other Names:

Copyright Info

Identification: This fish fluke possesses special adhesive sacs in the anterior attachment region. There are generally 7 pairs of hooks and 2–4 eyespots in this area in dactylogyrids.  Unlike the closely related D. amphibothrium, there are no tegumental sacs, spikes, or pads specialized to contain glands in D. hemiamphibothrium (El-Naggar and Kearn 1983; Post 1983).

At least 14 species of Dactylogyrus are found in Lake Huron, 5 in Lake Superior and 6 in Lake Erie. To date, Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium has been found only in Eurasian Ruffe in Lake Superior. Extreme care should be taken with species identification as members of this genus are quite similar.


Size: Can grow to 1.4 mm in length and 0.18 mm in width (Gussev 1985).


Native Range: D. hemiamphibothrium is native to Eurasia (U. S. Department of the Interior 1993).


Map Key
This map only depicts Great Lakes introductions.

 
Great Lakes Nonindigenous Occurrences: D. hemiamphibothrium was recorded for the first time in 1992 in the St. Louis River, a tributary of Lake Superior; it probably first arrived in the early 1980s with introduced Eurasian Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) (U. S. Department of the Interior 1993).


Table 1. Great Lakes region nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium are found here.

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
MN199219921St. Louis
WI199819981Lake Superior

Table last updated 5/1/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.


Ecology: Dactylogyrids in general are oviparous, have no uterus, and only contain one egg at a time in an ootype structure (Post 1983). There is no free-swimming larval stage; young grow to nearly adult size inside the parent (El-Naggar and Kearn 1983). This species is considered to be specific to ruffe in its native range (U. S. Department of the Interior 1993), although it is listed as a parasite of the genera Gymnocephalus and Perca by Gibson et al. (1996). It occurred on the gill filaments of Eurasian Ruffe in the St. Louis River (U. S. Department of the Interior 1993).


Means of Introduction: D. hemiamphibothrium was very likely introduced with its host, Eurasian Ruffe, in ballast water (U. S. Department of the Interior 1993).


Status: Established.


Great Lakes Impacts:
Summary of species impacts derived from literature review. Click on an icon to find out more...

Environmental

 

There is little or no evidence to support that Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium has significant environmental impacts in the Great Lakes.
Potential:
Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium is a parasite of percids, particularly in the genus Gymnocephalus (U.S. Department of the Interior 1993); it has also been reported to parasitize the genus Perca (Gibson et al. 1996). Due to host specificity for Eurasian ruffe (G. cernua) in its native range, D. hemiamphibothrium is unlikely to exert negative impacts on native fish species in the Great Lakes (U.S. Department of the Interior 1993).

There is little or no evidence to support that Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes.

There is little or no evidence to support that Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes.
Potential:
In the Great Lakes, D. hemiamphibothrium appears to be host specific to the introduced Eurasian Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) (U.S. Department of the Interior 1993), infection of which could lead to population reductions. However, no such effects have yet been realized in the Great Lakes.


Management:  

Regulations (pertaining to the Great Lakes)
There are no known regulations for this species.

Note: Check federal, state/provincial, and local regulations for the most up-to-date information.

Control
Biological
Implementation of Eurasian Ruffe management may potentially decrease D. hemiamphibothrium prevalence due to host specificity. However, Ruffe management is considered by some (e.g., Ogle 1998) to be difficult and impractical given that the species has developed several adaptations to compensate for high mortality rates (Lind 1977) and populations rebound quickly (Lelek 1987).

Physical
Establishment of quarantines may prevent monogenean fluke transmission (Reed et al. 1996).

Chemical
Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium specific treatments are unknown. However, multiple chemicals are effective at treating monogenean fluke infections in aquaculture systems. Effective benzimidazoles include levamisole (Buchmann 1997) and praziquantel, which has high efficacy against Dactylogyrus ssp. (Buchmann 1997, Schmahl and Mehlhorn 1985). Effective bath treatments include formaldehyde (30-100 ppm), sodium chloride, copper sulphate, hydrogen peroxide, sodium percarbonate (Buchmann and Kristensen 2003), formalin (25 mg/L for prolonged exposure or 150-250 mg/L for 30 minutes), and potassium permanganate (2 mg/L for prolonged exposure or 10 mg/L for 30 minutes) (Reed et al. 1996). Effective organophsophate bath treatments include metrifonate (0.25-0.5 ppm) and dichlorvos (0.25-0.5 ppm) (Sarig et al. 1965).
Pond infestations can be controlled with formalin (30 mg/L) or trichlorfon (Lepidex®; 0.5 mg/L) (Reed et al. 1996). However, monogenean eggs display chemical resilience and therefore the above chemical treatments are ineffective at destroying eggs (Reed et al. 1996, Rowland et al. 2007). Chemical toxicity varies considerably between monogeneans and fish species. Toxicology and tolerance tests are suggested prior to using anthelmintics (“dewormers”). Managers are encouraged to consider specific host drug tolerance, temperature, salinity, organic material content, and drug retention time prior to treatment (Buchmann and Bresciani 2006). Freshwater fish species can also be dipped in saltwater to minimize external parasite numbers prior to stocking (Reed et al. 1996).

Other
Lampricide TFM may effectively eliminate up to 97% of ruffe, potential carriers of D. hemiamphibothrium, with minimal non-target mortality (Crosier et al. 2012).

Note: Check state/provincial and local regulations for the most up-to-date information regarding permits for control methods. Follow all label instructions.


References (click for full reference list)


Other Resources:
Author: Kipp, R.M., A.K.Bogdanoff, A. Fusaro and R. Sturtevant.


Contributing Agencies:
NOAA GLRI Logo


Revision Date: 9/13/2019


Citation for this information:
Kipp, R.M., A.K.Bogdanoff, A. Fusaro and R. Sturtevant., 2024, Dactylogyrus hemiamphibothrium Ergens, 1956: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatLakes/FactSheet.aspx?Species_ID=2731&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes, Revision Date: 9/13/2019, Access Date: 5/2/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.