Labidesthes sicculus (Cope, 1865)

Common Name: Brook Silverside

Synonyms and Other Names:

Copyright Info

Identification: Body slender, elongate, only slightly compressed laterally. Head distinctly flattened above. Long, pointed snout and relatively large, beaklike mouth. Teeth long, sharp, conical and recurved in three rows on jaws. Two dorsal fins, first spiny and second soft. Forked tail with one anal spine. Well developed pelvic and pectoral fins. Pale green to olive, often transparent (swim bladder and spine often visible) with a brilliant silvery lateral band. Scales on the back are usually outlined with fine dark spots. Males and females have no dimorphism and are nearly identical. See Becker (1983); Page and Burr (1991); Etnier and Starnes (1993); Jenkins and Burkhead (1994).

Brook Silverside can be distinguished from Golden Silverside/Stout Silverside (Labidesthes vanhyningi) by the ratio of thoracic length to abdominal length (>2 in L. sicculus vs. <2 in L. vanhyningi) and the shape of the midlateral stripe (tapered in front of the first dorsal fin in L. sicculus vs. not tapering in L. vanhyningi) (Werneke and Armbruster 2015)


Size: Average adult total length of 7.6 cm and a maximum of 13.0 mm (Nelson 1968).


Native Range: Freshwaters of eastern North America including the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes except for Lake Superior (although Roth et al. (2013) listed Brook Silverside as a ‘probable native’); the Mississippi River basin from southern Quebec to eastern Minnesota and south to Louisiana; and the Atlantic and Gulf slopes from Santee River drainage, South Carolina to Galveston Bay drainage, Texas (Page and Burr 1991).

Native to Lake Erie and Lake Ontario (and their tributaries) and the St. Lawrence and Ottawa rivers.  Also native to Lake Michigan tributaries (Hocutt and Wiley 1986). Type specimen for the species was collected in 1865 near Grosse Ile in the Detroit River, Michigan (Cahn 1927).


Great Lakes Nonindigenous Occurrences: The most recent record of Brook Silverside in Lake Superior was in the mouth of the St. Louis River in 2004 and 2006. 


Table 1. Great Lakes region nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Labidesthes sicculus are found here.

Full list of USGS occurrences

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
MI197420102Lake Superior; Menominee
MN200420061St. Louis
NY198320082Grass; Oneida
VT199820002Lake Champlain; Mettawee River

Table last updated 5/2/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.


Ecology: Inhabits clear, weedy lakes – restricted to the top meter of water, usually the top few centimeters (Cahn 1927; Becker 1983). Adapted for living at the surface, usually with their flattened head in contact with the surface film. School during daylight, but disperse at night. The young are extremely temperature sensitive and are positively phototropic. These reactions, coupled with a preference for a narrow pH range of 7.65 to 7.7 result in the daily inshore-offshore migrations noted in the fall (Cahn 1927). Mortality begins at temperatures below 7ºC (Nelson 1968) and adults have a lethal thermal maxima of 35.1ºC (Farless and Brewer 2017).

Brook Silverside is an annual species that mature at age 1 and usually die before reaching 18 months (Marsden et al. 2000). They spawn in spring and early summer in and around vegetation, esp. Scirpus and Potamogeton when water temperatures reach 20ºC and spawning climaxes at 22.4ºC (Cahn 1927). Females produce 400 to 700 eggs, which are orange and attached by a ~2.0 cm long adhesive filament – hatching in 8-9 days (Becker 1983).  Juveniles exhibit extremely rapid growth with 70-80% of total length achieved within the first year prior to winter (Scott and Crossman 1973; Becker 1983). Liifespans rarely exceed 2 years as individuals die after spawning.

It is a specialized feeder, preying on cladocera, small flying insects, and Chaoborus larvae. Their diet is dominated by terrestrial insects (Johnson et al. 2017). This species feeds with a snapping action, often jumping to capture flying insects (Scott and Crossman 1998). Brook Silverside are consumed by a variety of organisms, including waterfowl, turtles, water snakes, crayfish, minks, and fish (Becker 1983) and may be an important forage fish for Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus dolomieu), Cisco (Coregonus artedi) and Gar (Lepisosteus osseus) (Cahn 1927).


Means of Introduction: Accidental and bait bucket release as well as canal connections and stocking for forage.

Page and Burr (1991) reported that the species had been introduced, usually into impoundments, as forage for sport fishes. Apparently, therefore, most introductions have been intentional (e.g., Jenkins and Burkhead 1994, and references cited therein). The species was accidentally introduced in Nebraska at the Sutherland cooling pond in July 1979 (Rowe 1992).

Introductions in New York and Vermont are a result of canal connections. Lake Champlain is connected to the Hudson and Mohawk rivers via a canal (Marsden et al. 2000).


Status: Established in Nebraska; the New River, West Virginia; Lake Champlain, Vermont and in the Erie/Mohawk and Hudson drainages in New York. Eradicated in California. Unknown status in Colorado and Potomac River, West Virginia.

Great Lakes
Native in Lakes Michigan, Huron, Erie, and Ontario. Reproducing and overwintering at self-sustaining levels have been recorded in the St. Louis River, Lake Superior. With the colonization of Lake Superior, this species is now widespread in the Great Lakes.


Great Lakes Impacts: Current research on the environmental impact of Labidesthes sicculus in the Great Lakes is inadequate to support proper assessment.

Potential: 
Early work on this species as a potential biocontrol for midges indicates that it could affect the population densities and community composition of aquatic insect larvae – but this effect appears not to have been documented for any nonindigenous population.

Brook Silverside is host to a variety of fish parasites, including Agamonema sp., Neascus sp. (Bangham and Hunter 1939), Diplostomum sp. (Bangham 1972), and Dermocystidium sp. (McAllister and Cloutman 2016). Neascus brevicaudatus, which is invasive in the Great Lakes, can cause black spot disease in highly infected fish. However, many native fish in Lake Superior are also host to this parasite as well and the additional impact of Brook Silverside would be likely very limited.

There is little or no evidence to support that Labidesthes sicculus has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes.

There is little or no evidence to support that Labidesthes sicculus has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes.

Potential:
Ideal forage fish and when abundant may be an important prey item for game fish (Scott and Crossman 1998).  Not widely known is the fact that the Brook Silverside was also brought into California for the purpose of midge biocontrol. The Fish and Game Commission, at its January 1963 meeting, granted authority to the Lake County Mosquito Abatement District to import the Brook Silverside into California. The program was described by Cook (1968). The fish were obtained from Ohio, apparently in 1964, and were released in isolated, experimental ponds in the vicinity of Lakeport. The experiments were considered successful, and at its August 1967 meeting, the Commission approved the District's request to release Brook Silverside into Upper and Lower Blue Lakes in Lake County. However, although they reproduced and did well in one experimental pond for three years, they died from unknown causes and none were ever released into the Upper or Lower Blue Lakes. Given the abundance and rapid spread of the inland silverside in California and controversies surrounding its impact on sport and nongame fishes, it is not surprising that the Brook Silverside received no further consideration.


Management: Regulations (pertaining to the Great Lakes region)
This species may be rare in portions of its native range and listed in those states as endandered, threatened rare, of concern or other special regulatory status. Harvest of fish, including seining for baitfish, is regulated in many states. 

Note: Check federal, state/provincial, and local regulations for the most up-to-date information.

Control
Biological
There are no known biological control methods for this species.

Physical
There are no known physical control methods for this species

Chemical
There are no known chemical control methods specific to this species.  General piscides (e.g., rotenone) may be effective, but significant non-target mortality is expected.

Note: Check state/provincial and local regulations for the most up-to-date information regarding permits for control methods.


Remarks: Large specimens are reportedly used for bait by anglers (Scott and Crossman 1973), but there are no documented records of bait bucket releases. Voucher specimens: Nebraska (UN 3314, 01498, 3291, 3292, 3293, 5603); New York (NYSM 44769, 50568, 50870).

Labidesthes sicculus and L. vanhyningi (Golden Silverside or Stout Silverside) have recently been described as two separate species due to morphological and life history differences (Werneke and Armbruster 2015).

Round Goby invasions in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River have reduced predation pressure which may have indirectly increased Brook Silverside abundance (Morissette et al. 2018).


References (click for full reference list)


Author: Fuller, P., Sturtevant, R., Bartos, A., Neilson, M.


Contributing Agencies:
NOAA GLRI Logo


Revision Date: 3/17/2023


Peer Review Date: 8/3/2021


Citation for this information:
Fuller, P., Sturtevant, R., Bartos, A., Neilson, M., 2024, Labidesthes sicculus (Cope, 1865): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatLakes/FactSheet.aspx?Species_ID=318&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes, Revision Date: 3/17/2023, Peer Review Date: 8/3/2021, Access Date: 5/2/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.