Eubosmina coregoni (Baird, 1857)

Common Name: Baltic Long-nosed Waterflea

Synonyms and Other Names:

Eubosmina coregoni



Copyright Info

Identification: Females of this water flea exhibit larger and more variable traits with respect to the carapace and antennules than do males. The females’ large antennules are located anteriorly and ventrally. The females’ postabdominal claw is emarginate near the tip and has proximal pecten only, with 3–5 short spines. That of the male becomes very narrow distally. The anterior sensory bristle of this species is near the end of the rostrum and close to the attachment of the antennules. There is no mucro or the mucro is extremely small. The lateral headpore is close to the attachment of the mandibles but relatively far from the headshield (Deevey and Deevey 1971; Pennak 1989; Dodson and Frey 1991; Lord et al. 2006).


Size: from 0.2 to 0.8 mm in length (Pennak 1989; Barbiero and Tuchman 2004)


Native Range: Eubosmina coregoni is native to Europe (Haney and Taylor 2003).


Great Lakes Nonindigenous Occurrences: First known occurrence in the US was in 1966 from Lake Michigan; by the 1970s–1980s it was considered to have spread to all the Great Lakes and by the 1990s it was present in many inland lakes within 100 km of the Great Lakes (Mills et al. 1993; Demelo and Hebert 1994).  It should be noted that in a relatively recent survey, this species was not found in Lake Superior (Barbiero et al. 2001).

 


Table 1. Great Lakes region nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Eubosmina coregoni are found here.

Full list of USGS occurrences

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
IL196619661Lake Michigan
MI196720062Lake Huron; Lake Michigan
MN200120011Lake Superior
NY196720065Lake Champlain; Lake Erie; Lake Ontario; Saranac River; Seneca
OH199820041Lake Erie
PA199820021Lake Erie
WI199920012Lake Michigan; Lake Superior

Table last updated 4/19/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.


Ecology: Found in freshwater ponds and lakes.  Algae-eating cladoceran; in less populated, homeostatic waters, E. coregoni infrequently reproduces sexually and instead maintains populations by parthenogenic females; maximum populations are found in late June in the US.

The distribution of E. coregoni varies seasonally in the Great Lakes. In Lake Michigan, it occurs in the nearshore region at 5–10 m from the surface in fall and winter, but more frequently at 20–30 m depth in the height of the summer. In the same lake, it is relatively uniformly distributed horizontally in fall and winter, but in summer it occurs significantly more frequently in water 0–18 km from shore than in open water. When it occurs predominantly at the surface in Lake Michigan, E. coregoni is an important food item for such fish species as bloater (Coregonus hoyi) (Gannon 1975, 1976; Evans et al. 1980; Crowder and Crawford 1984).            

In eutrophic lakes in Europe, E. coregoni is often dominant in spring and fall. However, in the Great Lakes it is almost completely absent in spring and is more abundant in summer, potentially reaching densities of around 69,000 per m2 in western Lake Erie and around 44,500 per m2 in Lake Ontario. It has also been recorded at high densities in the fall in Lake Ontario and Lake Michigan (Roth and Stewart 1973; Geller and Müller 1981; Johansson and O’Gorman 1991; Barbiero et al. 2001).        

Eubosmina coregoni filter feeds and feeds raptorially, selecting specific phytoplankton in the water column. It specifically selects particles of 0.5–5 μm in size and thus is much more tolerant of eutrophic conditions and the presence of cyanobacteria such as Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii than many larger Daphnia spp. Larger cladocerans experience difficulty feeding in the presence of cyanobacteria because they do not feed selectively and longer algae filaments clog their filtering apparatuses (Henning et al. 1991; Mayer et al. 1997; Cyr 1998; Donabaum et al. 1999).            

Reproduction in E. coregoni can occur either between sexual females and males, or parthenogenetically in asexual females. The mean number of eggs found per individual from 1981–1986 in Lake Ontario ranged from around 0.4–1.2. E. coregoni can produce resting eggs that can stay dormant in the sediments for long periods of time. These eggs will hatch under the influence of specific environmental conditions. For example, E. coregoni was once recorded to emerge from resting eggs after a drought and the re-acidification of a lake in Sudbury, Canada (Johansson and O’Gorman 1991; Arnott and Yan 2002; Lord et al. 2006).            

Changes in this species’ morphology with season, or cyclomorphosis, may be related to predation and/or temperature. Further studies need to be carried out to test these hypotheses, especially in North America. Most studies have been carried out in Europe, but different forms of this species occur in Europe in comparison with North America (Kappes and Sinsch 2002).            

This is a freshwater species. It can experience mortality at salinities of 3‰ (Nauwerck 1991).


Means of Introduction: Eubosmina coregoni was very likely introduced via ballast water to the Great Lakes and transferred within the network of ports by further ballast water movement and exchange. It probably expanded into inland lakes via long-distance dispersal and migration (Mills et al. 1993; Demelo and Hebert 1994).

Suchy and Hann (2007) suggested that the transfer of E. coregoni in the digestive tract of rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) may be responsible for introducing the species to water bodies west of the Laurentian Great Lakes, demonstrating how waterflea resting eggs may transform biological predation from a form of control to a vector for transport.


Status: Established throughout all the Great Lakes drainages; however, status in Lake Superior is uncertain.

One of the dominant zooplankton species in the Great Lakes; average numbers from a 1970 sample of Otsego Lake showed densities of 30,000 organisms per m3.


Great Lakes Impacts:
Summary of species impacts derived from literature review. Click on an icon to find out more...

EnvironmentalBeneficial


Current research on the environmental impact of Eubosmina coregoni in the Great Lakes is inadequate to support proper assessment.


It is possible that the presence of E. coregoni and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) veligers in Lake Ontario could have aided the establishment of the exotic blueback herring (Alosa aestivalis; Ricciardi 2001).Eubosmina coregoni serves as a significant Great Lakes food item of introduced alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) and the introduced spiny water flea (Bythotrephes longimanus) (Grigorovich et al. 1998, Mills et al. 1995).

There is little or no evidence to support that Eubosmina coregoni has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes.

There is little or no evidence to support that Eubosmina coregoni has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes.


When congregated at the surface of Lake Michigan, E. coregoni is an important food item for such fish species as bloater (Coregonus hoyi) (Crowder and Crawford 1984).


Management: Regulations (pertaining to the Great Lakes)
There are no known regulations for this species.

Note: Check federal, state/provincial, and local regulations for the most up-to-date information.

Control

Biological
Young-of-year bloaters (Coregonus hoyi) have been shown to surface feed on Eubosmina coregoni in Lake Michigan, but their effectiveness as a control is unknown, especially because they have been documented moving to the benthos earlier to avoid competition from the invasive alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) (Crowder and Crawford 1984). Bythotrephes spp. are known to consume E. coregoni in Russia and the U.S. (Grigorovich et al. 1998), and E. coregoni populations declined significantly immediately following the invasion of the waterflea Bythotrephes longimanus in the Laurentian Great Lakes Michigan, Huron, and Erie, with direct predation by B. longimanus the most likely explanation (Barbiero and Tuchman 2004). E. coregoni levels in B. longimanus-invaded areas have remained at low levels, indicating a significant population-wide impact, but the long-term effectiveness of B. longimanus as a biological control method is unknown (Barbiero and Tuchman 2004).

Physical
E. coregoni may be transported over land by recreational boaters (Suchy and Hann 2007). Though it is not as likely to foul gear and attach to equipment as the more commonly known spiny waterflea (Bythotrephes longimanus) and fishhook waterflea (Cercopagis pengoi), the same responsible maintenance and cleaning methods are recommended to prevent spread between water bodies, including cleaning all aquatic equipment with high pressure water (>250 psi) or hot water (>50°C) after each use (Ontario’s Invading Species Awareness Program). Electron beam irradiation and ultraviolet light treatments have been used to control spiny and fishhook waterfleas in aquatic pathways, and are likely effective against E. coregoni (GLMRIS 2012). Another possible non-selective pathway control is high water turbidity, which may decrease zooplankton (especially cladoceran) abundances due to the negative effects of suspended clay particles on filtering and assimilation rates (Suchy and Hann 2007).

Chemical
E. coregoni is a freshwater cladoceran. Mortality has been documented quickly at salinities >3% (Nauwerck 1991). Gemza (1995) documented a shift from copepods to cladocerans as dominant zooplankton at increasingly eutrophic sites in Severn Sound, Lake Huron. Zooplankton biomass generally increases with increasing eutrophication, so reduction of excessive nutrient pollution causing abnormal eutrophication could help control E. coregoni (Gemza 1995). A study of the effects of cadmium and zinc on Lake Michigan zooplankton found that E. coregoni was significantly reduced by separate and combined treatments of 2 µg Cd/L and 100 µg Zn/L, with negative effects primarily due to zinc (Marshall et al. 1981). A more recent study on the effects of copper sulfate (used to control algal biomass in eutrophic water bodies) and Carbaryl (used to control aquatic pests) on zooplankton found that levels of 50 µg/L Cu and 20 µg/L Carbaryl individually reduced E. coregoni biomass by >50% (Havens 1994).

Note: Check state/provincial and local regulations for the most up-to-date information regarding permits for control methods. Follow all label instructions.


Remarks: After the introduction of B. longimanus to the Great Lakes, populations of E. coregoni greatly decreased in the mid to late 1980s and have remained at lower densities since this time. Population decreases in E. coregoni that occurred in the 1980s in Severn Sound, Lake Huron could also have been related to changes in fish community structure (Gemza 1995; Barbiero and Tuchman 2004).

Although the current name listed for this species by the Integrated Taxonomic Information System is Eubosmina coregoni, the most current suggested name is currently Bosmina (Eubosmina) cf. coregoni based on Kotov et al. (2009) (Whitmore and Bailey pers comm. 2019). Species names that include cf are often subject to change or updates, so GLANSIS and NAS are waiting until a consensus is reached before updating this species' name.


References (click for full reference list)


Author: Kipp, R.M., A.J. Benson, J. Larson, T.H. Makled, and A. Fusaro


Contributing Agencies:
NOAA GLRI Logo


Revision Date: 9/12/2019


Citation for this information:
Kipp, R.M., A.J. Benson, J. Larson, T.H. Makled, and A. Fusaro, 2024, Eubosmina coregoni (Baird, 1857): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?Species_ID=161&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DHuron, Revision Date: 9/12/2019, Access Date: 4/19/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.