Cyclotella cryptica Reimann, Lewin, and Guillard, 1963

Common Name: A centric diatom

Synonyms and Other Names:

Copyright Info

Identification: This centric diatom exhibits very stiff, thin, crystalline, and chitinous fibril appendages that attach to the pores of its valves (Herth and Zugenmaier 1977). In Lake Michigan, valves are almost flat to slightly concentrically undulate. In the region around the valve’s edge there are wide striae with chambers. In between the straie are radially arranged costae terminating with a small spine near the edge of the valve. The openings in the costae merge into the central area of the valve, which displays 1–5 off-centre fultoportulae (Stoermer and Yang 1969).

Cyclotella cryptica can exhibit different morphologies depending on salinity. It can appear similar to C. meneghiniana, which generally has thicker walls than the typical form of C. cryptica, and a region of costae and intercostae that is delimited from the central region (Reimann et al. 1963; Schultz 1971). The diameter of C. cryptica can range from 5–25 µm depending on environmental conditions. In Lake Michigan, diameter ranges from 8–16 µm (Neümuller et al. 2002, Reimann et al. 1963, Stoermer and Yang 1969).


Size: 5-25 microns


Native Range: Unknown. The distribution of C. cryptica is widespread (Mills et al. 1993).


Map Key
This map only depicts Great Lakes introductions.

 
Great Lakes Nonindigenous Occurrences: Cyclotella cryptica was recorded for the first time in Lake Michigan in 1964 and now also occurs in Lake ErieLake Huron, Lake Ontario, and the Sandusky River, which flows into Lake Erie (Lowe and Kline 1976, Mills et al. 1993).


Table 1. Great Lakes region nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Cyclotella cryptica are found here.

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
19831983*
IL199519951Lake Michigan
MI198319952Lake Huron; Lake Michigan
NY199319931Lake Ontario
OH197619762Lake Erie; Sandusky
WI199419951Lake Michigan

Table last updated 4/23/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.

* HUCs are not listed for areas where the observation(s) cannot be approximated to a HUC (e.g. state centroids or Canadian provinces).


Ecology: Cyclotella cryptica is a planktonic species first isolated from brackish water. It is also known to tolerate saltwater. It is typically found in harbors in parts of the Great Lakes where there are abnormally high chloride concentrations. It has been known to account for up to 18.5% of diatom abundance in the Oswego Harbor of Lake Ontario. It occurs at maximum abundance around 20°C (Herth and Zugenmaier 1977, Liu and Hellebust 1976, Makarewicz 1987, Mills et al. 1993, Stoermer and Ladewski 1976, Stoermer and Yang 1969).

In marine and brackish environments, C. cryptica requires NO3 as its source of nitrogen. It also requires Ni ions in order to grow autotrophically. It is capable of heterotrophic growth in the dark on glucose. This suggests it can survive for extended periods of time in bottom water or mud enriched in glucose. When environmental conditions higher in the water column improve, it probably resumes photoautotrophic growth. It is known to grow mesotrophically as well (Oliveira and Antia 1984, Reimann et al. 1963, Saros and Fritz 2000, White 1974).

Cyclotella cryptica produces an exudate that has the ability to suppress growth responses of other species such as Skeletonema costatum in environments enriched by vitamin B-12 (Messina and Baker 1982).

Cyclotella cryptica can generate auxospores from vegetative cells. It can also produce posteriorly flagellated male gamete stages (Hust et al. 1999, Schultz 1971).


Means of Introduction: Cyclotella cryptica was very likely introduced in ballast water (Mills et al. 1993).


Status: Established where recorded.


Great Lakes Impacts:
Summary of species impacts derived from literature review. Click on an icon to find out more...

EnvironmentalBeneficial


 

There is little or no evidence to support that Cyclotella cryptica has significant environmental impacts in the Great Lakes.

Potential:
Cyclotella cryptica is a euryhaline species and within the Great Lakes is found primarily in nearshore areas, bays, and river mouths that have an elevated salinity (approximately 100-160 Cl- mg/mL) due to salt pollution (Liu and Hellebust 1976, Makarewicz 1987). It does not itself affect water quality.

Cyclotella cryptica can grow heterotrophically for up to one year and could potentially outcompete native species in low or no light conditions, although this has not been recorded in the Great Lakes (White 1974).

There is little or no evidence to support that Cyclotella cryptica has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes.

There is little or no evidence to support that Cyclotella cryptica has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes.
Potential:
Cyclotella cryptica is a species that is important to the growing algal biofuels industry. Roessler (1988) found that C. cryptica grown in silica-deficient conditions had significantly higher levels of lipid production. Researchers are currently attempting to genetically engineer other species of algae that contains the acetyl-CoA carboxylase enzyme found in C. cryptica in order to increase lipid content (Day et al. 2012).


Management:  

Regulations (pertaining to the Great Lakes region)
There are no known regulations for this species

Note: Check federal, state/provincial, and local regulations for the most up-to-date information.

Control
Biological
There are no known biological control methods for this species.

Physical
There are no known physical control methods for this species.

Chemical
There are no known chemical control methods for this species.

Other
Cyclotella cryptica is a euryhaline species (Liu and Hellebust 1976). As a result, reduction in run-off from winter road salt could decrease the chloride levels in the rivermouth areas and reduce the viable habitat for C. cryptica.

Note: Check state/provincial and local regulations for the most up-to-date information regarding permits for control methods. Follow all label instructions.


References (click for full reference list)


Other Resources:
Author: Kipp, R.M., M. McCarthy, and A. Fusaro


Contributing Agencies:
NOAA GLRI Logo


Revision Date: 9/12/2019


Citation for this information:
Kipp, R.M., M. McCarthy, and A. Fusaro, 2024, Cyclotella cryptica Reimann, Lewin, and Guillard, 1963: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?Species_ID=1671&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DHuron, Revision Date: 9/12/2019, Access Date: 4/23/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.