Apocorophium lacustre (Vanhoffen, 1911)

Common Name: Scud

Synonyms and Other Names:

Copyright Info

Identification: A. lacustre have large pediform second antennae that makes them visually distinctive from other amphipods. They have a telson that is small and narrow compared to their body. The body is subcylindrical with fused urosome segments. Thoracopods are segmented and uniramous.


Size: 6 mm


Native Range: Apocorophium lacustre is native to the Vistula lagoon, the Rhine River, and the North Sea (Ezhova et al. 2005, Faasse and van Moorsel 2003). In North America, Apocorophium lacustre’s  native range also includes the Atlantic coast from the Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick to the St. Johns River estuary, Florida (Bousfield 1973).


This species is not currently in the Great Lakes region but may be elsewhere in the US. See the point map for details.

Table 1. States/provinces with nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Apocorophium lacustre are found here.

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
IL200320156Highland-Pigeon; Lower Illinois; Lower Illinois-Lake Chautauqua; Lower Ohio-Bay; Upper Illinois; Upper Mississippi-Cape Girardeau
IN200520105Blue-Sinking; Highland-Pigeon; Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon; Middle Ohio-Laughery; Silver-Little Kentucky
KY200420108Blue-Sinking; Highland-Pigeon; Little Scioto-Tygarts; Lower Ohio-Bay; Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon; Middle Ohio-Laughery; Ohio Brush-Whiteoak; Silver-Little Kentucky
MO200620061Upper Mississippi-Cape Girardeau
OH200520105Little Scioto-Tygarts; Middle Ohio-Laughery; Ohio Brush-Whiteoak; Raccoon-Symmes; Upper Ohio-Shade
PA200820081Upper Ohio
WV200520104Little Muskingum-Middle Island; Raccoon-Symmes; Upper Ohio-Shade; Upper Ohio-Wheeling

Table last updated 4/26/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.


Ecology: Scuds are found in waters with DO ranging from 1.2-6.9 mg/L (Llansó and Sillett 2009). This species is described as salt tolerant (Evans et al. 2004), from 0-30 ppt (Wolf et al. 2009), and euryhaline, but it tends to be found in the least saline environments (Faasse and van Moorsel 2003). Apocorophium lacustre also inhabit freshwater, and are found in the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, and Ohio River (United States Geological Survey 2013). It is present in the Illinois River near Peoria and Pekin, Illinois (United States Geological Survey 2013), where the mean water temperatures in January is 1°C (Harmeson and Schnepper 1965). Apocorophium lacustre has been found in temperatures up to 31.4°C (Llansó and Sillett 2009). Apocorophium lacustre is a detritus, suspension, and surface-deposit feeder (Llansó and Sillett 2009, Power et al. 2006) making it a moderately dietary generalist with a flexible diet. Like other amphipods, A. lacustre broods its young, a strategy associated with enhanced colonization success.

This species is found in low abundance in its native communities (Faasse and van Moorsel 2003). Its relative abundance and frequency of occurrence increased in the Ohio River from 2004 through 2006 (from 1.7-13.8%) and the Upper Mississippi River between 2004 and 2006 (0-11%) (Grigorovich et al. 2008). In a community studied in Germany, Apocorophium lacustre was the second-most dense arthropod, found in 14% of samples (Ysebaert et al. 2000).

In its native habitat (Rhine River), A. lacustre is found in lower littoral and sublittoral regions and on boulder (10-50 cm diameter) substrate (Faasse and van Moorsel 2003). In the Upper Mississippi River, A. lacustre was found associated with hard, stable substrates – rocks and snags; in the Ohio River, where cobble and boulder habitats were less available, it colonized primarily sand and snags. This species is epibenthic and typically associated with inorganic substrates, aquatic vegetation, or zebra mussel colonies (Grigorovich et al. 2008). With widespread dreissenid mussel colonies, benthic production is very high in the Great Lakes (Grigorovich et al. 2008).


Means of Introduction: Apocorophium lacustre has a moderate probability of introduction to the Great Lakes (Confidence level: High).

Potential pathway(s) of introduction: Dispersal, Hitchhiking/Fouling, Transoceanic Shipping

Apocorophium lacustre already occurs in waters connecting to the Great Lakes (Upper Mississippi River near Joliet, Illinois and the Ohio River (United States Geological Survey 2013). Apocorophium lacustre could easily expand within the upper Mississippi River waterway via hull fouling associated with dreissenid mussel colonies (Grigorovich et al. 2008). Apocorophium lacustre is an abundant fouler (Llansó and Sillett 2009) and could easily be transported by recreational boaters and anglers from neighboring waters via fouling colonies. The strength of this recreational vector is unknown but is likely relatively infrequent and small. Apocorophium lacustre can be transported by ballast water (Power et al. 2006) and is able to survive large ranges of salinity (Wolf et al. 2009) making it capable of surviving to destinations within the Great Lakes.


Status: Apocorophium lacustre has a high probability of establishment if introduced to the Great Lakes (Confidence level: High).

Apocorophium lacustre is regarded as introduced in the Gulf of Mexico and the southern North Sea coast of Europe (Bousfield 1973, Grigorovich et al. 2008, Power et al. 2006). In North America, Apocorophium lacustre has been introduced into the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, and Ohio River (United States Geological Survey 2013). It has also been introduced to the River Werra in central Germany (Szöcs et al. 2014). This species’ range is rapidly expanding in the Upper Mississippi River system (Grigorovich et al. 2008).

Apocorophium lacustre inhabits the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, and Ohio River (United States Geological Survey 2013). These regions are very similar or identical to the Great Lakes region. Also, this species inhabits regions with a wide variety of abiotic factors, a range that includes those conditions found in the Great Lakes.

Apocorophium lacustre is pollution tolerant (Evans et al. 2004), survives wide ranges of DO (Llansó and Sillett 2009), is salt tolerant (Wolf et al. 2009), and inhabits freshwater environments (United States Geological Survey 2013). Apocorophium lacustre is already present in North American rivers where winter temperatures reach 1°C (Harmeson and Schnepper 1965) which suggest that it could survive the winter temperatures experienced in the Great Lakes. Apocorophium lacustre is a dietary generalist with a flexible diet (Llansó and Sillett 2009, Power et al. 2006) and could adjust its diet in the Great Lakes.

In other ranges where Apocorophium lacustre has been introduced, there are no existing control methods set to prevent the introduction or spread of Apocorophium lacustre. The tube-building habit of A. lacustre is unique but its effect is likely to be non-specific. This behavior may protect A. lacustre from predation by other species thereby facilitating its survival and establishment in novel habitats (Armsby and Tish 2006, Grigorovich et al. 2008).


Great Lakes Impacts:
Summary of species impacts derived from literature review. Click on an icon to find out more...

Environmental

Apocorophium lacustre has the potential for moderate environmental impact if introduced to the Great Lakes.

A. lacustre will compete with native mussels for food and habitat space and have been known to overwhelm populations (USACE 2013).  IT has also been found to alter food webs and decrease faunal diversity in areas of non-native establishment.  This species may have contributed to a decline in Gammarus pseudolimnaeus (Grigorovich et al. 2008).  

There is little or no evidence to support that Apocorophium lacustre has the potential for significant socio-economic impacts of introduced to the Great Lakes.

It has not been reported that Apocorophium lacustre poses a threat to human health or water quality. There is no evidence that this species negatively impacts infrastructure, economic sectors, recreational activities and associated tourism, or the aesthetic appeal of the areas it inhabits.

There is little or no evidence to support that Apocorophium lacustre has the potential for significant beneficial impacts of introduced to the Great Lakes.

It has not been indicated that Apocorophium lacustre can be used for the control of other organisms or improving water quality. There is no evidence to suggest that this species is commercially, recreationally, or medically valuable. It does not have significant positive ecological impacts.


Management: There are no existing control methods set to prevent the introduction or spread of this species.

*Ballast water regulations applicable to this species are currently in place to prevent the introduction of nonindigenous species to the Great Lakes via shipping. See Title 33: Code of Federal Regulations, Part 151, Subparts C and D (33 CFR 151 C) for the most recent federal ballast water regulations applying to the Great Lakes and Hudson River.


References (click for full reference list)


Author: Fusaro, A., A. Davidson, K. Alame, M. Gappy, W. Conard and Sturtevant


Contributing Agencies:
NOAA GLRI Logo


Revision Date: 12/19/2018


Citation for this information:
Fusaro, A., A. Davidson, K. Alame, M. Gappy, W. Conard and Sturtevant, 2024, Apocorophium lacustre (Vanhoffen, 1911): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?Species_ID=2315&Potential=Y&Type=2&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes, Revision Date: 12/19/2018, Access Date: 4/26/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.