There is little or no evidence to support that Anguilla rostrata has significant environmental impacts in the Great Lakes outside of its native range.
Realized:
American eels in Texas and South Carolina have been found to be infected with the Asian eel nematode Anguicolla crassus (Fries et al. 1996, M. Ray, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, pers. comm.). This nematode was originally known only to infect the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, in Southeast Asia (Kuwahara et al. 1974). However, this parasite has spread into the European eel, A. anguilla, and is now present in most European countries with up to 100% infectivity in some areas (Kennedy and Fitch 1990, Neumann 1985, Paggi et al. 1982). It colonizes the eel’s swimbladder, causing retarded growth and maturation, and is fatal to a high percentage of infected individuals. It has also been found to infect fin fish, with unknown consequences (R. Ward, Texas Parks and Wildlife, pers. comm.). A. crassus was first reported in U.S. waters in 1993, when an infected eel was found in a Texas aquaculture facility (Fries et al. 1996, M. Ray, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, pers. comm.). It is thought to have arrived in the U.S. from shipments of infected foreign European eels, and has now colonized much of the Atlantic coast from Florida to New York (Reid 2001). Potential:
This parasite is not yet present in the Great Lakes or St. Lawrence River, and it is considered unlikely to become established in eel populations in those regions due to extended cold winter water temperatures (4-9°C or less) (Knopf et al. 1998). However, there is a chance of this parasite being transmitted to these waters when summer water temperatures are above 9°C (Reid 2001). Many other parasites are also capable of infecting American eels, including protozoans, trematodes, cestodes, acanthocephalans, and crustaceans (Hoffman 1967).
There is little or no evidence to support that Anguilla rostrata has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes outside of its native range.
Realized:
As this species is native to Lake Ontario, its spread into the upper Great Lakes is not expected to have any significant negative socio-economic impact. An active eel fishery is currently maintained in Ontario on the Lake Ontario/St. Lawrence River ecosystem, however, these populations are currently suffering decline, as are many other native eel populations (Reid 2001). It is unknown how expanded Anguilla rostrata populations throughout the rest of the Great Lakes will affect the Lake Ontario population, or whether expanded populations will become commercially valuable on their own. Recreational landings of American eel since 1981 have generally accounting for less than 1% of total eel landings for U.S. recreational harvest, and eel catches in recreational fisheries are usually incidental to other targeted species (Shepherd 2006).
There is little or no evidence to support that Anguilla rostrata has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes outside of its native range.
Realized:
Glass eels are a popular part of the diet in Europe and are a delicacy on the Asian market. Therefore, this young life phase was heavily harvested in the U.S. from the Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of St. Lawrence and shipped to Asia up until the 1970s (USFWS 2006). Currently, Maine is the only U.S. state to maintain a commercial American eel fishery (USFWS 2006), and a commercially valuable fishery is also present in Ontario on the Lake Ontario/St. Lawrence River ecosystem as well (Reid 2001). These fishery populations, as well as most other native populations, are suffering recent severe declines (Reid 2001). It is unknown if any beneficial contribution will be had on the commercially valuable fishery population in Lake Ontario as a result of expanded American eel populations in the Great Lakes. It is also unknown whether these non-native populations will become commercially viable in the Great Lakes on their own if they continue to expand.
Remarks: Since 2005, A. rostrata has been classified as apparently secure in the United States (N4) (NatureServe 2010). However, throughout the United States as a whole, American eel populations have experienced a decline over the past few decades, likely due to habitat loss and alteration, barriers to migration, over-fishing, parasitism, and pollution (Haro et al. 2000). Juvenile recruitment in Lake Ontario experienced an 81-fold decline between the years of 1985 to 1992 (Castonguay et al. 1994). Declines in the northern range of the American eel population are especially significant, as northern sub-populations are thought to carry the highest reproductive potential (Casselman 2003).