Current research on the environmental impact of Craspedacusta sowerbii in the Great Lakes is inadequate to support proper assessment. Potential:
The impact of this widespread hydroid is unclear. Many studies of Craspedacusta sowerbii feeding behavior have concluded that this species could have significant impacts on zooplankton communities due to increased predation pressure and prey preference (e.g., Smith and Alexander 2008, Stefani et al. 2010). For instance, Dodson and Cooper (1983) proposed that C. sowerbii's preference for predatory zooplankton, such as the rotifer Asplanchna, could influence relative zooplankton species structure. Spadinger and Maier (1999) agreed with theorized effects on zooplankton communities, finding that C. sowerbii hydromedusae prefer larger zooplankton (0.4–1.4 mm) and vigorous prey such as copepods. In a study of how C. sowerbii predation could affect the traits of prey species, Jankowski (2004) found that C. sowerbii predation did not appear to have a significant effect on the life history or development of Bosmina longirostris. However, predation pressure did appear to induce some morphological changes, such as increased lengths of both mucro and antennae as a defense mechanism (Jankowski 2004).
A European study used field enclosures and microcosms to test the potential effects of C. sowerbii presence on the local ecosystem and found that there was a significant decrease in small crustaceans (especially juvenile cyclopoid copepods and B. longirostris) in microcosms with C. sowerbii and a significant increase in chlorophyll concentration in enclosures with C. sowerbii (Jankowski et al. 2005). The latter of these observations indicates that C. sowerbii may be capable of contributing to trophic cascade effects. However, in situ evidence of C. sowerbii impacts on the zooplankton community or other trophic levels is currently lacking.
Direct and indirect impacts of C. sowerbii on fish populations are also unclear. Under laboratory conditions and in 4 mm of water, C. sowerbii polyps have killed and fed on striped bass larvae (Dendy 1978). Dumont (1994) speculated that C. sowerbii may consume fish eggs, but Spadinger and Maier (1999) note that it is generally not considered an important predator of eggs or small fish. Crayfish are considered the only important predator of the hydromedusa phase (Pennak 1989, Slobodkin and Bossert 1991). Because C. sowerbii populations are not checked by predation, freshwater jellyfish may be and have been abundant in ecosystems where fish abundance is also high, despite the potential for competition over food resources (Jankowski et al. 2005). Adverse effects on fish populations due to C. sowerbii-related food web alterations have yet to be documented.
There is little or no evidence to support that Craspedacusta sowerbii has significant socio-economic impacts in the Great Lakes.
There is little or no evidence to support that Craspedacusta sowerbii has significant beneficial effects in the Great Lakes.