Carassius carassius (Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Name: Crucian carp

Synonyms and Other Names:

Crucian carp, golden carp, gibele, Prussian carp, English carp, Carassius vulgaris (Nilsson, 1840), Cyprinus arassius (Linneaus, 1758)



Copyright Info

Identification: Distinguishing characteristics were provided by Berg (1964), Muus and Dahlstrom (1978), Wheeler (1978), Raicu et al. (1981), Howells (1992b) and Wheeler (2000).


Dorsal rays iii-iv (14-21); Anal rays ii-iii (5-8); Pharyngeal teeth in one row (0,4-4,0); Gill rakers 22-33; lateral line scales 28-37.  Dorsal and anal fins have a serrated, spinelike ray.  Typically, individuals are deep-bodied and laterally compressed; however, a slender "shallow-body" variety also exists.  The body is golden copper, darker dorsally with reddish fins.  Barbels are not present around the mouth.


Size: To about 50 cm and 5 kg (Berg 1964; Wheeler 1978).


Native Range: Europe and Siberia (Raicu et al. 1981).


This species is not currently in the Great Lakes region but may be elsewhere in the US. See the point map for details.

Table 1. States/provinces with nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state/province, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Carassius carassius are found here.

State/ProvinceFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
IL191019101Chicago

Table last updated 5/4/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.


Ecology: The Crucian carp is known for its remarkable hardiness (Muus and Dahlstrom 1978). Historical accounts report the species can live for hours out of the water (Seeley, 1886).  The Crucian Carp is tolerant of low-oxygen conditions, high turbidity, low ph (down to 4), and a broad temperature range.  It can tolerate temperatures from 0 to 38 C (optimum at 27 C) (Holopainen & Oikari 1992 and Lenkiewicz 1964 and Horoszeqich 1973 in Holopainen et al. 1997). Survival has been documented at water temperatures below 0°C, and individuals may even survive for a few days with a frozen integument (Szczerbowski and Szczerbowski 2001).  In Finland, the shift in energy allocation from growth and reproduction to the accumulation of glycogen occurs in July. These carbohydrate reserves, along with a shift to anaerobic metabolism that decreases metabolic rate to 20-30% of the aerobic rate, help C. carassius survive prolonged periods of anoxia and low temperatures (Holopainen et al. 1997; Piironen and Holopainen 1986; Holopainen and Hyvärinen 1984). In response to hypoxia, this species’ gill will display a protruding lamellae that increases the respiratory surface area allowing the Crucian Carp a greater capacity for oxygen uptake. The efficiency of Crucian Carp haemoglobin in extracting oxygen from the water allows this species to reduce the surface area of its gill filaments during normoxic conditions,which reduces osmoregulatory costs and improves its tolerance to toxic substances (Poleo et al. 2017; Sollid et al. 2003). In their native range, feeding may stop for several months as the fish rest in a state of "suspended animation" during winter months when ponds become anoxic and covered with ice (Zhadin and Gerd 1963, Penttinen and Holopainen 1992).  Carassius carassius is a freshwater species, but lab experiments have noted that this species can survive for at least 6 hours in hypersaline water (16 ppm).

Carassius carassius are relatively inactive fish that inhabit littoral zones and tend to locate themselves within habitat structure, especially in the presence of predators (Greenberg et al. 1995 in Holopainen et al. 1997). Crucian Carp thrive in shallow ponds with dense, emergent vegetation such as Typha spp. and Phragmites spp. (Wheeler 2000).

Crucian Carp actively feed during the summer months (Penttinen and Holopainen 1992). While planktonic and benthic invertebrates typically form the dominant part of the diet, Carassius carassius will also feed on phytoplankton plant material, and detritus (Penttinen and Holopainen 1992, Paszkowski et al. 1996 in Holopainen et al. 1997).

Crucian Carp typically have a lifespan of 10 years with males reaching sexual maturity at 3 years and females at 4 in Central and Eastern Europe (Freyhof and Kottelat 2008).

Crucian Carp spawn intermittently from late spring through mid-summer, after water temperatures have reached the required threshold of 17-20 C (Seymour 1981 in Holopainen et al. 1997). This species is a phytophilous, open substrate spawner with eggs that adhere to submerged structures and macrophytes (Holopainen et al. 1997). Relative and absolute fecundity varies among populations and environments and increases with size. Average relative fecundity of Crucian Carp in Lake Varaslampi was 129.2 eggs/g of fish, which would amount to an absolute fecundity of 121,822.7 for an average sized female in that lake (942.9 g wet mass) (Moisander 1989 in Holopainen et al. 1997). Fertilized eggs were found to develop normally in laboratory conditions at 15-28 C, but died at 5, 10, and 30 C. Temperatures of 24-28 C resulted in the quickest (>3 days) incubation from fertilization to the free embryo stage. In Scandinavian ponds, hatching took six days at 18-19 C (Laurila et al. 1987 in Holopainen et al 1997).

Growth rates can be highly variable and are believed to be strongly influenced by population densities and food availability. In their first year of life, Carassius carassius have been observed to range in size from 2.2 to 10.9 cm depending on the population density, environment, and when an individual was born during the spawning season (Skora 1982, Piironen and Holopainen 1988 in Holopainen et al. 1997).

This species occurs regularly in small ponds (often as a monoculture assemblage) as well as in larger lakes with high species richness. Crucian Carp exhibit two distinct morphologies which are reported to be driven predominantly by the fish community assemblage. Particularly, the existence of “pond” and “lake” forms of Crucian Carp are believed to be strongly related to the presence or absence of predators more than environmental or physical characteristics of the water body. In Swedish lakes, Crucian Carp population density and size were significantly smaller (mean size 9.2 cm, 20 g) in ponds and lakes without piscivores than in water bodies with piscivores (mean size 31.3 cm, 735 g) (Bronmark et al. 1995). However, growth-stunted, low-bodied (‘pond’ form) Crucian Carp were observed to shift their deep-bodied form (‘lake’ form) when introduced into a fishless, productive pond. This suggests that two different conditions can induce Crucian Carp to grow into the deep-bodied lake forms: 1) the presence of piscivorous fish and 2) increased food availability in the absence of piscivorous fish (Holopainen et al. 1997).


Means of Introduction: Carassius carassius has a low probability of introduction to the Great Lakes (Confidence level: High).

Potential pathway(s) of introduction: Unauthorized intentional release

Carassius carassius are available from aquarium stores online under several names (e.g., “gold Crucian carp”). There is also a significant potential for misidentification (Tarkan et al. 2010) and sale of Crucian carp as or with goldfish (Carassius auratus).  This species spreads primarily through human release, which has been rapid due to confusing/mistaken taxonomic identification, as well as its common occurrence as a pet in Europe.


Status: There are no recent reports of Crucian carp in the United States. An earlier report that either the Crucian carp or a hybrid (with goldfish) had been introduced into Texas (Howells 1992; Fuller et al. 1999) is now considered unlikely. The introduction and status of this species remains uncertain.

Carassius carassius is native to local areas of England and has spread throughout the fresh waters of the North Sea and Baltic Sea basins, across the northern part of France and Germany to the Alps, throughout the Danube basin, and then eastwards to Siberia (Wheeler 2000). This species spread occurs primarily through human release, which has been rapid due to confusing/mistaken taxonomic identification, as well as its common occurrence as a pet in Europe.

Carassius carassius has a moderate probability of establishment if introduced to the Great Lakes (Confidence level: High).

Carassius carassius can survive in a wide variety of water conditions and are remarkably hardy. They are omnivores.  Carassius carassius are an open substrate spawner with eggs that adhere to twigs and macrophytes (Holopainen et al. 1997) so they use aquatic weeds for spawning (and egg attachment) (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department 2013). The Great Lakes region has many habitat types that would meet the requirements for Carassius carassius.

 


Great Lakes Impacts:
Summary of species impacts derived from literature review. Click on an icon to find out more...

EnvironmentalSocioeconomicBeneficial



Carassius carassius has the potential for high environmental impact if introduced to the Great Lakes.
Crucian Carp are viable hosts for the fatal spring viraemia of carp virus. This virus has the potential to affect native cyprinids as well as non-cyprinid species such as Northern Pike (Esox lucius), Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides), and Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) (Dixon and Stone 2017).  Benthic feeding and disturbance of surface sediment may have an important effect on nutrient cycling and trophic dynamics (Holopainen et al. 1997).

There is little or no evidence to support that Carassius carassius has the potential for significant socio-economic impacts if introduced to the Great Lakes.

It has not been reported that Carassius carassius poses a threat to human health or water quality. There is no evidence that this species negatively impacts infrastructure, economic sectors, recreational activities and associated tourism, or the aesthetic appeal of the areas it inhabits.

Carassius carassius has the potential for moderate beneficial impact if introduced to the Great Lakes.

Carassius carassius is a superb bait fish, but low value as food in Europe (Holopainen et al. 1997). Its growth rate is very high in eutrophic waters making them potential producers of high quality animal protein for fodder or human food by aquaculture (Holopainen et al. 1997). Also, there is a great potential for laboratory culture and wide range of feeding habits make Crucian carp a suitable fish for species for routine ecotoxicologial assays (Holopainen et al. 1997).


Management: Regulations
In Ohio, it is unlawful for any person to possess, import or sell live Carassius carassius and dead specimens must be headless, preserved in ethanol or formaldehyde, or eviscerated. Possessing, importing, purchasing, selling, propagating, transporting or introducing Carassius carassius is prohibited in Minnesota. There are no regulations on C. carassius in Ontario, New York, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, or Wisconsin.

Control

Biological
In Lake Savijarvi, Finland, stocking of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) was done in conjunction with removal seining to reduce the biomass of Crucian Carp. In three years following the stocking, Crucian Carp biomass decreased from 243 to 136 kg while Northern Pike increased from 0.1 to 5.7 kg per seining hectare. Pike consumption of Crucian Carp was 17% of the removal catch during one year of the study (Lappalainen et al. 2013). The presence of predatory fish in the Great Lakes may limit the proliferation of Carassius carassius if it were to become established.

Physical
Various types of physical controls that have been used to control other non-indigenous fish might also be effective in managing C. carassius. Patrick et al. (1985) observed that air bubble curtains have been successful in deterring Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax), Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus), and Gizzard Shad (Dorosoma cepedianum)—especially when used in conjunction with strobe lights. Other types of physical treatments have been employed in fish control include reservoir drawdowns, traps, nets, electrofishing, and combinations of these treatments. Through their review of fish control methods, Meronek et al. (1996) observed that projects that utilized nets were the most successful of the previously listed physical treatments.

Chemical
Of the four chemical piscicides registered for use in the United States, rotenone and antimycin have been used in the majority of chemical control projects and have had varied success rates for different species and different bodies of water (Boogaard et al. 1996; GLMRIS 2012; Meronek et al. 1996; Marking et al. 1983).

Note: Check state and local regulations for the most up-to-date information regarding permits for pesticide/herbicide/piscicide/insecticide use.


Remarks: Because of this species' similarity to goldfish, and because of possible hybridization, characters may overlap and positive identification may be difficult. Similar to the goldfish, the Crucian carp is known to hybridize with the common carp Cyprinus carpio (Berg 1964; Muus and Dahlstrom 1978; Wheeler 1978). Eddy and Underhill (1974) reported that both the goldfish and the Crucian carp had been introduced into the United States, but they provided no additional details concerning the latter species. Welcomme (1988) reported that C. carassius was established in Chicago in the 1900s but later died out; however, he did not provide documentation for that record and we have found no additional information to support it.

There is some confusion in the literature surrounding the use of the names Crucian carp and Prussian carp. Lever (1996) listed Prussian Carp as an alternative or local vernacular name sometimes used for the Crucian carp; however, Berg (1964) and most others use the name Prussian carp for Carassius auratus gibelio. In the 1800s Baird witnessed fish taken out of the Hudson River, New York; Baird later wrote that these fish appeared to be "hybrids between goldfish and the Prussian carp" (Redding 1884). In that instance it is not certain as to which species Baird is referring to in using the term Prussian carp. Cole (1905) quoted from one of Baird's reports, in which Prussian carp is treated as synonymous with Cyprinus carassius (=Carassius carassius?).


References (click for full reference list)


Author: Schofield, P.J., L.G. Nico, P. Fuller, A. Fusaro, A. Davidson, K. Alame, M. Gappy, W. Conard, P. Alsip and R. Sturtevant


Contributing Agencies:
NOAA GLRI Logo


Revision Date: 8/14/2018


Citation for this information:
Schofield, P.J., L.G. Nico, P. Fuller, A. Fusaro, A. Davidson, K. Alame, M. Gappy, W. Conard, P. Alsip and R. Sturtevant, 2024, Carassius carassius (Linnaeus, 1758): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, and NOAA Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information System, Ann Arbor, MI, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?Species_ID=509&Potential=Y&Type=2&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes, Revision Date: 8/14/2018, Access Date: 5/4/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.