References: (click for full references)
Boogaard, M.A., T.D. Bills, J.H. Selgeby, and D.A. Johnson. 1996. Evaluation of piscicides for control of ruffe. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16(3):600-607.
Carlson, D.M., R.A. Daniels, and J.J. Wright. 2016. Atlas of inland fishes of New York. New York State Museum Record 7. New York State Education Department, Albany, NY.
Carlson, D. – New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC), Watertown, NY.
Cincotta, D.A., and J.R. Stauffer Jr. 1984. Temperature preference and avoidance studies of six North American freshwater fish species. Hydrobiologia 109(2):173-177. dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00011576.
Cooper, E.L. 1983. Fishes of Pennsylvania and the Northeastern United States. Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, PA.
Crail, T.D., R.A. Krebs, and D.T. Zanatta. 2011. Unionid mussels from nearshore zones of Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 37(1):199-202.
Fuller, P.L., L.G. Nico, and J.D. Williams. 1999. Nonindigenous fishes introduced into inland waters of the United States. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 27. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Gale, W.F., G.L. Buynak. 1978. Spawning frequency and fecundity of satinfin shiner (Notropis analostanus)— a fractional, crevice spawner. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 107(3):460-463. dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1978)107<460:SFAFOS>2.0.CO;2.
Gibbs, R.H., Jr. 1963. Cyprinid fishes of the subgenus Cyprinella of Notropis. The Notropis whipplei-analostanus-chloristius complex. Copeia 1963(3):511-528. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/1441471.
Gilbert, C.R. 1980. Zoogeographic factors in relation to biological monitoring of fish. Pages 309-355 in Hocutt, C.H., and J.R. Stauffer, Jr, eds. Biological monitoring of fish. Lexington Books, DC Heath and Company. Lexington, MA.
Gilbert, C.R. 1993. Geographic distribution of the striped mullet in the Atlantic and eastern Pacific oceans. Florida Scientist 56(4):204-210.
GLMRIS. 2012. Appendix C: Inventory of available controls for aquatic nuisance species of concern, Chicago Area Waterway System. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. http://glmris.anl.gov/documents/docs/anscontrol/All27ANSControlFactSheets.pdf.
Hove, M.C., and R.J. Neves. 1994. Life history of the endangered James spinymussel Pleurobema collina (Conrad, 1837) (Mollusca: Unionidae). American Malacological Bulletin 11(1):29-40. http://www.fishwild.vt.edu/mussel/PDFfiles/life_history_spinymussel.pdf.
Jenkins, R.E., and N.M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Johnson, J.H., and D.S. Dropkin. 1992. Predation on recently released larval American shad in the Susquehanna River Basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12(3):504-508. dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1992)012<0504:PORRLA>2.3.CO;2.
Nichols, S.J., and D. Wilcox. 1997. Burrowing saves Lake Erie clams. Nature 389:921. https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v389/n6654/full/389921a0.html.
Nalepa, T.F. 1994. Decline of native unionid bivalves in Lake St. Clair after infestation by the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:2227-2233.
Marking, L.L., T.D. Bills, J.J. Rach, and S.J. Grabowski. 1983. Chemical control of fish and fish eggs in the Garrison Diversion Unit, North Dakota. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3(4):410-418.
Meronek, T.G., P.M. Bouchard, E.R. Buckner, T.M. Burri, K.K. Demmerly, D.C. Hatleli, R.A. Klumb, S.H. Schmidt, and D.W. Coble. 1996. A Review of Fish Control Projects. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:63-74.
Page, L.M., and B.M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. 2nd edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, MA.
Patrick, P.H., A.E. Christie, D. Sager, C. Hocutt, and J. Stauffer, Jr. 1985. Responses of fish to a strobe light/air-bubble barrier. Fisheries Research 3:157-172.
Schloesser, D.W., and T.F. Nalepa. 1994. Dramatic decline of unionid bivalves in offshore waters of western Lake Erie after infestation by the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:2234-2242.
Smith, C.L. 1985. The inland fishes of New York State. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
Stout, J.F. 1975. Sound communication during the reproductive behavior of Notropis analostanus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). The American Midland Naturalist 94(2):296-325. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2424428.pdf.
Stone, U.B. 1940. Studies on the Biology of the Satinfin Minnows, Notropis analostanus and Notropis spilopterus. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Taeubert, J., M. Denic, B. Gum, M. Lange, and J. Geist. 2010. Suitability of different salmonid strains as hosts for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20(7):728-734. dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1147.
Trembley, F.J. 1961. Research project on effects of condenser discharge water on aquatic life, progress report 1960. Institute of Research, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Tyus, H.M., and J.F. Saunders, III. 2000. Nonnative fish control and endangered fish recovery: Lessons from the Colorado River. Fisheries 25(9):17-24. dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025<0017:NFCAEF>2.0.CO;2.
Winn, H.E., and J.F. Stout. 1960. Sound production by the Satinfin shiner, Notropis analostanus, and related fishes. Science 132(3421):222-223. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1705159.
Zanatta, D.T., G.L. Mackie, J.L. Metcalfe-Smith, and D.A. Woolnough. 2002. A refuge for native freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from impacts of the exotic zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Lake St. Clair. Journal of Great Lakes Research 28(3):479-489.
Zieritz, A., B. Gum, R. Kuehn, and J. Geist. 2012. Identifying freshwater mussels (Unionoida) and parasitic glochidia larvae from host fish gills: A molecular key to the North and Central European species. Ecology and Evolution 2(4):740-750. dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.220.
This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.