Common name: Brassy Minnow
available through www.itis.gov
Identification: Becker (1983); Holton (1990); Page and Burr (1991); Pflieger (1997).
Size: to 9.7 cm TL
Native Range: Upper St. Lawrence River and Lake Champlain drainages, Quebec and New York, across Great Lakes, Hudson Bay, and Missouri--upper Mississippi River basins of southern Canada and northern United States south to Kansas; Fraser River system (Pacific Slope), Alberta and British Columbia (Page and Burr 1991).
Puerto Rico &
Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) Explained
Native range data for this species provided in part by NatureServe
Interactive maps: Point Distribution Maps
Table 1. States with nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Hybognathus hankinsoni are found here.
Table last updated 10/4/2018
† Populations may not be currently present.
Means of Introduction: Smith (1985) suggested that its presence in the Susquehanna River drainage, New York, may have been by way of dispersal through the Chenango Canal. However, this species was not reported from the Susquehanna drainage in a review of the species' distribution by Bailey (1954), and the Chenango Canal has been inactive since the late 1800s. Thus it is more likely due to a bait bucket introduction; Smith (1985) reports that the Brassy Minnow is frequently used as a baitfish. According to Etnier and Starnes (1993), the Tennessee record was based on a single specimen taken in 1973; they considered it a bait bucket introduction. Records in Colorado also may be the result of bait bucket releases. There is no information for means of its introduction into Utah.
Status: Reported from Colorado, New York, Tennessee, and Utah.
Impact of Introduction: The impacts of this species are currently unknown, as no studies have been done to determine how it has affected ecosystems in the invaded range. The absence of data does not equate to lack of effects. It does, however, mean that research is required to evaluate effects before conclusions can be made.
References: (click for full references)
Bailey, R.M. 1954. Distribution of the American cyprinid fish Hybognathus hankinsoni
with comments on its original description. Copeia 1954(4):289-291.
Becker, G.C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Madison Press, Madison, WI.
Etnier, D.A., and W.C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tenneessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.
Holton, G.D. 1990. A field guide to Montana fishes. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Helena, MT.
Page, L.M., and B.M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. The Peterson Guide Series, vol. 42. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
Pflieger, W. 1997. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Environmental Conservation, Jefferson City, MO.
Smith, C.L. 1985. The inland fishes of New York State. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
Tilmant, J.T. 1999. Management of nonindigenous aquatic species in the U.S. National Park System. National Park Service.
Pam Fuller, and Matt Neilson
Revision Date: 9/26/2012
Peer Review Date: 4/1/2016
Pam Fuller, and Matt Neilson, 2018, Hybognathus hankinsoni Hubbs in Jordan, 1929: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=544, Revision Date: 9/26/2012, Peer Review Date: 4/1/2016, Access Date: 10/20/2018
This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.