The Nonindigenous Occurrences section of the NAS species profiles has a new structure. The section is now dynamically updated from the NAS database to ensure that it contains the most current and accurate information. Occurrences are summarized in Table 1, alphabetically by state, with years of earliest and most recent observations, and the tally and names of drainages where the species was observed. The table contains hyperlinks to collections tables of specimens based on the states, years, and drainages selected. References to specimens that were not obtained through sighting reports and personal communications are found through the hyperlink in the Table 1 caption or through the individual specimens linked in the collections tables.

Ranoidea caerulea
Ranoidea caerulea
(Australian Green Treefrog)

Copyright Info
Ranoidea caerulea (White, 1790)

Common name: Australian Green Treefrog

Synonyms and Other Names: Pelodryas caerulea, Litoria caerulea, White’s treefrog, dumpy treefrog.

Taxonomy: available through www.itis.govITIS logo

Identification: A large, green, arboreal hylid (treefrog) with large toepads (disks) for climbing.  Dorsal color ranges from a distinct jade green, blue-green or olive, with occasional white markings or indistinct stripe on sides (Tyler et al., 1984; [Frith] and Frith, 1987; Hoser, 1989; Bartlett and Bartlett, 1999; Cogger, 2000; also illustrated in Mattison, 1987a, b; Davies and Davies, 1997; Lamar, 1997; Krysko et al., 2011: MorphoBank M88446, www.morphobank.org, Project Number p536). Size is about 100-150 mm (3.9-5.9 in) (Hoser, 1989; Bartlett and Bartlett, 1999; Cogger, 2000). No other indigenous treefrog in Florida reaches such a large adult size or is jade green. Moreover, these would be the only treefrogs in Florida with a distinctive, lumpy or fleshy fold behind each eye, sometimes partially covering the tympanum (eardrum) (Tyler et al., 1984; Hoser, 1989; Bartlett and Bartlett, 1999; Cogger, 2000). Call is a distinct, deep barking or nasal “wark-wark-wark” (Tyler et al., 1984; Hoser, 1989).

Size: snout-vent length of 100-150 mm (3.9-5.9 in).

Native Range: Most of northern and eastern Australia, and southern New Guinea (Tyler et al., 1984; [Frith] and Frith, 1987; Hoser, 1989; Tyler, 1989, 1999; Cogger, 2000).

Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) Explained
Interactive maps: Point Distribution Maps

Nonindigenous Occurrences:

Table 1. States with nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Ranoidea caerulea are found here.

StateFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
FL199920194Everglades; Florida Southeast Coast; Kissimmee; Southern Florida
VA202320231Hampton Roads

Table last updated 4/21/2024

† Populations may not be currently present.

Means of Introduction: Pet industry escapees and intentional releases (Bartlett, 1994; Bartlett and Bartlett, 1999; Krysko et al., 2011). Great green treefrog breeding programs in Florida sometimes utilize orchid shade houses to breed frogs for the commercial pet trade (Bartlett, 1994).

Status: Butterfield et al. (1997) and Powell et al. (1998) uncritically list L. caerulea as established in Florida despite the lack of physical evidence. However, there is no evidence of established populations in Florida (Meshaka et al., 2004; Krysko et al., 2011).

Impact of Introduction: Unknown. These large, insectivorous frogs may potentially compete with native frogs and can easily swallow Florida’s native hylids and other small vertebrates.  It is not known if their aquatic tadpoles can impact indigenous aquatic wildlife.

Remarks: The systematics of L. caerulea have been reviewed by Faivovich et al. (2005) and Frost et al. (2006). Some researchers place L. caerulea in the genus Pelodryas (Duellman, 1993; also see comment by Tyler, 1999). In the pet trade these frogs are commonly known as White’s treefrog or dumpy treefrogs (Mattison, 1987a, b; Bartlett, 1994; Davies and Davies, 1997; Lamar, 1997; Wright and Whitaker, 2001). Litoria caerulea is said to breed in mid-May in Florida; however, no evidence was provided (Bartlett and Bartlett, 1999). Females may produce from a few hundred to over 1,000 floating eggs (Bartlett and Bartlett, 1999). These highly adaptable frogs are generalists, remarkably drought tolerant, and can survive in and around a variety of human habitations ([Frith] and Frith, 1987; Hoser, 1989; Bartlett, 1994; Bartlett and Bartlett, 1999; Cogger, 2000). It is unclear if great green treefrogs sold in Florida represent lineages from Australia or New Guinea, but Bartlett and Bartlett (1999) speculate that only Australian L. caerulea could possibly survive South Florida’s occasional freezes

References: (click for full references)

Bartlett, R. D. 1994. Florida’s alien herps.  Reptile & Amphibian Magazine (27):56-73, 103-109.

Bartlett, R. D., and P. P. Bartlett. 1999. A Field Guide to Florida Reptiles and Amphibians. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston. 280 pp.

Bell, B. D. 1982. The amphibian fauna of New Zealand. Pp. 27-92. In: D. G. Newman (editor). New Zealand herpetology. New Zealand Wildlife Service Occasional Bulletin (2):1-495.

Butterfield, B. P., W. E. Meshaka, Jr., and C. Guyer. 1997. Nonindigenous amphibians and reptiles.  Pp. 123-138. In: D. Simberloff, D. C. Schmitz, and T. C. Brown (editors). Strangers in Paradise. Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, D. C. 467 pp.

Cogger, H. G. 2000. Reptiles & Amphibians of Australia. Sixth Edition. Ralph Curtis Publishing, Sanibel Island, Florida. 808 pp.

Davies, R., and V. Davies. 1997. The Reptile & Amphibian Problem Solver. [North American Edition.] Tetra Press, Blacksburg, Virginia. 208 pp.

Duellman, W. E. 1993. Amphibian species of the world: Additions and corrections. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Special Publication (21):1-372.

Faivovich, J., C. B. F. Haddad, P. C. A. Garcia, D. R. Frost, J. A. Campbell, and W. C. Wheeler. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294:1-240.

[Frith], C., and D. Frith. 1987. Australian Tropical Reptiles & Frogs. Tropical Australian Graphics, ‘Prionodura’ Paluma via Townsville, Queensland. 71 pp.

Frost, D. R. (editor). 1985. Amphibian Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographical Reference. Allen Press, Inc. and The Association of Systematics Collections. Lawrence, Kansas. 732 pp.

Frost, D. R., T. Grant, J. Faivovich, R. H. Bain, A. Haas, C. F. B. Haddad, R. O. De Sá, A. Channing, M. Wilkinson, S. C. Donnellan, C. J. Raxworthy, J. A. Campbell, B. L. Blotto, P. Moler, R. C. Drewes, R. A. Nussbaum, J. D. Lynch, D. M. Green, and W. C. Wheeler. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297:1-370 + Fig. 50 foldout.

Hoser, R. T. 1989. Australian Reptiles & Frogs. Pierson & Co, Sydney. 238 pp.

Hudson, B., and T. J. Thornton. 1994. Reptiles & Amphibians in New Zealand: Handbook for Species Identification. Print Media Specialists, Auckland. 50 pp.

Kraus, F. 2009. Alien Reptiles and Amphibians. A Scientific Compendium and Analysis. Springer, [Dordrecht]. 563 pp. + CD-ROM.

Krysko, K. L., J. P. Burgess, M. R. Rochford, C. R. Gillette, D. Cueva, K. M. Enge, L. A. Somma, J. L. Stabile, D. C. Smith, J. A. Wasilewski, G. N. Kieckhefer III, M. C. Granatosky, and S. V. Nielsen. 2011. Verified non-indigenous amphibians and reptiles in Florida from 1863 through 2010: Outlining the invasion process and identifying invasion pathways and status. Zootaxa 3028:1-64.

Lamar, W. W. 1997. The World’s Most Spectacular Reptiles & Amphibians. World Publications, Tampa. 208 pp.

Mattison, C. 1987a. Frogs & Toads of the World. Facts on File, Inc, New York. 191 pp.

Mattison, C. 1987b. The Care of Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity. Revised Edition. Blandford Press, London. 317 pp.

Meshaka, W. E., Jr., B. P. Butterfield, and J. B. Hauge. 2004. The Exotic Amphibians and Reptiles of Florida. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida. 155 pp.

Powell, R., J. T. Collins, and E. D. Hooper Jr. 1998. A Key to Amphibians & Reptiles of the Continental United States and Canada. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence. 131 pp. 

Robb, J. 1986. New Zealand Amphibians and Reptiles in Colour. Revised [Edition]. William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland. 128 pp.

Tyler, M. J. 1989. Australian Frogs. Viking O’Neil, Penguin Books Australia Ltd, Ringwood. 220 pp.

Tyler, M. J. 1999. Distribution patterns of amphibians in the Australo-Papuan region. Pp. 541-556. In: W. E. Duellman (editor). Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians. A Global Perspective. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 633 pp.

Tyler, M. J., L. A. Smith, and R. E. Johnstone. 1984. Frogs of Western Australia. Western Australian Museum, Perth. 109 pp.

Wright, K. M., and B. R. Whitaker. 2001. Amphibian Medicine and Captive Husbandry. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida. 499 pp.

Author: Somma, L.A.

Revision Date: 1/10/2024

Citation Information:
Somma, L.A., 2024, Ranoidea caerulea (White, 1790): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=2276, Revision Date: 1/10/2024, Access Date: 4/22/2024

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.


The data represented on this site vary in accuracy, scale, completeness, extent of coverage and origin. It is the user's responsibility to use these data consistent with their intended purpose and within stated limitations. We highly recommend reviewing metadata files prior to interpreting these data.

Citation information: U.S. Geological Survey. [2024]. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida. Accessed [4/22/2024].

Contact us if you are using data from this site for a publication to make sure the data are being used appropriately and for potential co-authorship if warranted.

For general information and questions about the database, contact Wesley Daniel. For problems and technical issues, contact Matthew Neilson.