Common name: lesser pond sedge
Synonyms and Other Names: lesser pond sedge; European lake sedge
available through www.itis.gov
Identification: Plants colonial; rhizomes long-creeping. Culms central, coarse, trigonous, 55–130 cm, scabrous-angled. Leaves: basal sheaths pale green to brownish or red tinged; ligules 5–14 mm; blades glaucous, M-shaped, (4.5–)5.5–12(–20) mm wide, glabrous. Inflorescences 15–35 cm; proximal 2–5 spikes pistillate, ascending; distal spikes erect; terminal 1–2(–3) spikes staminate. Pistillate scales lanceolate, acute to acuminate, glabrous, at least the proximal with scabrous awn to 3.5 mm. Perigynia ascending, ± glaucous, often strongly red dotted, ± strongly 12–18-veined, thin-walled, narrowly ovoid, flattened-trigonous, 3–4.5 × 1.4–2.1 mm, glabrous; beak 0.3–0.6 mm, emarginate to weakly bidentulate, teeth to 0.2 mm. 2n = 78.Superficially resembles C. aquatilis, but is larger, has 3 stigmas, and has strongly veined perigynia 3–4.5 mm.
Size: to 0.75 m tall.
Native Range: Eurasia and Africa
Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) Explained
Puerto Rico &
Interactive maps: Point Distribution Maps
Table 1. States with nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Carex acutiformis are found here.
Table last updated 7/4/2022
† Populations may not be currently present.
Ecology: Carex acutiformis is a monocotyledonous perennial with laterally extending rhizomes and, in its native range, is capable of forming dense stands up to 1 m high (Hirose et al. 1989). It is found in open swamps, wet, open thickets, marsh edges, sedge meadows, eutrophic fens, and along the shores of ponds, rivers, and lakes, 0–300 m from shoreline. In dense stands of C. acutiformis, individual plants tend to have greater leaf area and higher leaf nitrogen concentrations in the top-most leaves, maximizing individual photosynthetic capacity (Hirose et al. 1989, Schieving et al. 1992). However, C. acutiformis also has a high leaf area ratio in general relative to other fen sedges (Konings et al. 1992). It also has a relatively high efficiency in nitrogen (N) use, but is less efficient in phosphorus (P) use (Aerts and de Caluwe 1994, Konings et al. 1992).
Tall Carex species, such as C. acutiformis, may dominate fens that are rainwater fed and base-poor relative to short Carex species, which tend to dominate base-rich fens (Verhoeven and Arts 1992). In acidic waters (e.g., base-poor fens), the decomposition of cellulose in C. acutiformus plant matter may occur slowly, preventing the full release of nutrients until 3-4 years after death and immobilizing N and P for a longer period of time relative to other sedges (Aerts and de Caluwe 1997, Verhoeven and Arts 1992). However, because C. acutiformis produces more leaf litter than most sedges, it may actually facilitate a higher rate of nutrient cycling than what the other sedges attain (Aerts and de Caluwe 1997).
Germination occurs at temperatures above 15°C, peak emergence is in early summer, and fruiting occurs June–August (Schütz 1998). Percent emergence (from seed) is very low at shaded sites, possibly due to a relatively high minimum temperature requirement. In European populations, the production of viable seed in C. acutiformis is low relative to that of other sedges, suggesting that clonal reproduction is favored (Schütz 1998).
Means of Introduction: It is suspected that this plant was introduced through hay from Europe. There are concerns that it may spread from roadside ditches where it occurs. The seeds, rhizome and root masses of the plant may attach to animals or possibly road maintenance equipment/ vehicles passing through a stand of this plant.
Impact of Introduction: Carex acutiformis forms large, glaucous clones where it is established but is, as yet, not spreading aggressivly into adjacent habitats.
References: (click for full references)
Aerts, R. and H. De Caluwe. 1997. Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78(1):244—260.
Aerts, R., and H. de Caluwe. 1995. Interspecific and intraspecific difference in shoot and leaf lifespan of four Carex species which differ in maximum dry matter production. Oecologia 102(4): 467—477.
Aerts, R. and H. De Caluwe. 1994. Nitrogen use efficiency of Carex species in relation to nitrogen supply. Ecology 75(8):2362—2372.
Catling, P.M. 2005. New "top of the list" invasive plants of natural habitats in Canada. Botanical Electronic News 345: 1—5. Available http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/ben345.html. Accessed 2011.
Catling, P.M., and B. Kostiuk. 2003. Carex acutiformis dominance of a cryptic invasive sedge at Ottawa. Botanical Electronic News 315: 1—6. Available http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/ben315.html. Acessed 2011.
Cayouette, J. and P.M. Catling. 1992. Hybridization in the Genus Carex with special reference to North America. Botanical Review 58(4): 351—438.
Curran, W.S., D.D. Lingenfelter, and L. Garling. 2009. Conservation Tillage Series: An introduction to weed management for conservation tillage systems. Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences: Agricultural Reserach and Cooperative Extension University Park, PA. 8 pp.
Flora of North America. 2008. www.eFloras.org
Hirose, T., M.J.A. Werger, and J.W.A. van Rheenen. 1989. Canopy development and leaf nitrogen distribution in a stand of Carex acutiformis. Ecology 70(6):1610—1618.
Konings, H., J.T.A. Verhoeven, and R. De Groot. 1992. Growth characteristics and seasonal allocation patterns of biomass and nutrients in Carex species growing in floating fens. Plant and Soil 147:183—196.
Konings, H., E. Koot, and T. Tijman-de Wolf. 1989. Growth characteristics, nutrient allocation and photosynthesis of Carex species from floating fens. Oecologia 80: 111—121.
Lawniczak, A.E., J. Zbierska, A. Choinski, and W. Szczepaniak. 2010. Response of emergent macrophytes to hydrological changes in a shallow lake, with special reference to nutrient cycling. Hydrobiologia 656: 243—254.
Reznicek, A. - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Schieving, F., T.L. Pons, M.J.A. Werger, and T. Hirose. 1992. The vertical distribution of nitrogen and photosynthetic activity at different plant densities in Carex acutiformis. Plant and Soil 14:9—17.
Schütz, W. 1998. Seed dormancy cycles and germination phonologies in sedges (Carex) from various habitats. Wetlands 18(2):288—297.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2011a. Aquatic herbicides. 8 pp.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2011b. Manual harvest and mechanical control methods. 9 pp.
Verhoeven, J.T.A. and H.H.M. Arts. 1992. Carex litter decomposition and nutrient release in mires with different water chemistry. Aquatic Botany 43:365—377.
Vymazal, J. 2011. Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review. Hydrobiologia 674: 133—156.
Vymazal, J., and L. Kröpfelová 2008. Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: environmental pollution. Volume 14. Springer Science. Ch. 6.
Cao, L., J. Larson, L. Berent, and A. Fusaro
Revision Date: 6/15/2012
Cao, L., J. Larson, L. Berent, and A. Fusaro, 2022, Carex acutiformis Ehrh.: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=2704, Revision Date: 6/15/2012, Access Date: 7/4/2022
This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.