Common name: Regal Demoiselle
Synonyms and Other Names: regal damsel
available through www.itis.gov
Identification: Overall body coloration is grey. Yellow or white posterior margin of dorsal, anal and caudal fins. Black "ear" spot. Meristics for specimens collected in the southern Gulf of Mexico: Dorsal fin XIII (11-12); anal fin II (11-12), pector fin 17, lateral line scales 17-18 (González-Gándara and de la Cruz-Francisco 2014). Similar species: brown chromis (Chromis multilineata) distinguished by the presence dark spot at base of pectoral fin; and yellowtail reeffish (Chromis enchrysura) distinguished by lobed (not forked) tail and presence of bright blue streak from snout above eyes and across nape.
Size: to 9 cm TL (Allen 1991)
Native Range: Indo-West Pacific: Red Sea and East Africa to the Philippines, north to southern Japan, south to northern Australia and Melanesia (except Fiji) (Allen 1991).
The first sightings in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico were on nearshore coral reefs near Coatzacoalcos, Mexico in 2013 (González-Gándara and de la Cruz-Francisco 2014). In 2014 and 2015, individuals were observed on reefs near Veracruz City, and at Madagascar Reef off the northwestern coast of the Yucatán Peninsula (Robertson et al. 2016). In 2017, the species was found in the northern Gulf of Mexico, including offshore Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida (R. Robertson pers. comm.). In July 2019, they were recorded from various locations on the western side of Trinidad, possibly as the result of hitch-hiking on oil platforms transported from the Indo-Pacific (Robertson and Kingon 2019).
A video showing the history of the invasion as well as live footage of a population of N. cyanomos is available here: http://zenodo.org/record/58455#.V5ZMdPkrKmU. In this video, the fish are remarkably abundant around an oil-platform. Video courtesy of N. Simoes and D. R. Robertson.
Table 1. States with nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Neopomacentrus cyanomos are found here.
Table last updated 1/16/2021
† Populations may not be currently present.
Ecology: Females deposit adhesive demersal eggs on a hard substrate. Eggs are elliptical and attached by adhesive filaments (Setu et al. 2010). The male guards, fans, and culls the clutch. Courtship and spawning were described by Setu et al. (2010). Larvae spend 17-19 days in the plankton before settling (Thresher et al. 1989). Occupies coral reefs to 60 ft depth and consumes zooplankton (Allen 1991). Randall et al. (1990) reports that the species occurs in protected areas, such as lagoons and harbors.
Means of Introduction: Unclear. Possible aquarium release, although listed in González-Gándara and de la Cruz-Francisco (2014) as a ballast transfer. Robertson et al. (2016) provide a discussion on the improbability of ballast water or shipping-related translocation, and the likelihood of other potential introduction vectors. It is not a common aquarium fish, making the pet-release hypothesis questionable (although still possible). Another more plausible but yet untested hypothesis is that the species hitch-hiked along with towed oil and gas platforms translocated from the native range. Robertson et al. (2018) analyzed potential pathways for introduction and determined that the most likely way the fish were introduced was as hitch-hikers on towed oil and gas platforms.
Status: Established in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico between Veracruz and Sisal (González-Gándara and de la Cruz-Francisco 2014; Robertson et al. 2016). Established in the northern Gulf of Mexico from Louisiana to the Florida panhandle.
Impact of Introduction: Unknown, although competition with native damselfishes is suspected (González-Gándara and de la Cruz-Francisco 2014).
References: (click for full references)
Allen, G.R. 1991. Damselfishes of the World. Mergus Publishers, Melle, Germany.
González-Gándara, C., and V. de la Cruz-Francisco. 2014. Unusual record of the Indo-Pacific pomacentrid Neopomacentrus cyanomos (Bleeker, 1856) on coral reefs of the Gulf of Mexico. BioInvasions Records 3:49-52.
Johnston, M.W., and J.L. Akins. 2016. The non-native royal damsel (Neopomacentrus cyanomos) in the southern Gulf of Mexico: An invasion risk? Marine Biology 163:12. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00227-015-2777-7
Randall, J.E., G.R. Allen, and R.C. Steene. 1990. Fishes of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea. University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu, HI.
Robertson, D.R., O. Dominguez-Dominguez, B. Victor, and N. Simoes. 2018. An Indo-Pacific damselfish (Neopomacentrus cyanomos) in the Gulf of Mexico: origin and mode of introduction. PeerJ 6:e4328 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4328
Robertson, D.R., N. Simoes, C. Gutiérrez Rodríguez, V.J. Piñeros, and H. Perez-España. 2016. An Indo-Pacific damselfish well established in the southern Gulf of Mexico: prospects for a wider, adverse invasion. Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation 19:1-17. http://www.oceansciencefoundation.org/josf19a.html
Robertson, D Ross, & Kingon, Kelly. (2019). The alien Indo-Pacific damselfish, Neopomacentrus cyanomos, at Trinidad. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3364568
Setu, S.K., T.T. Ajith Kumar, T. Balasubramanian, A.R. Dabbagh, and M. Keshavarz. 2010. Breeding and rearing of regal damselfish Neopomacentrus cyanomos (Bleeker 1856): the role of green water in larval survival. World Journal of Fish and Marine Sciences 2:551-557.
Thresher, R.E., P.L. Colin, and L.J. Bell. 1989. Planktonic duration, distribution and population structure of western and central Pacific damselfishes (Pomacentridae). Copeia 1989:420-434.
Schofield, P.J., and Neilson, M.E.
Revision Date: 9/9/2020
Peer Review Date: 1/14/2016
Schofield, P.J., and Neilson, M.E., 2021, Neopomacentrus cyanomos (Bleeker, 1856): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=2936, Revision Date: 9/9/2020, Peer Review Date: 1/14/2016, Access Date: 1/16/2021
This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.