Disclaimer:

The Nonindigenous Occurrences section of the NAS species profiles has a new structure. The section is now dynamically updated from the NAS database to ensure that it contains the most current and accurate information. Occurrences are summarized in Table 1, alphabetically by state, with years of earliest and most recent observations, and the tally and names of drainages where the species was observed. The table contains hyperlinks to collections tables of specimens based on the states, years, and drainages selected. References to specimens that were not obtained through sighting reports and personal communications are found through the hyperlink in the Table 1 caption or through the individual specimens linked in the collections tables.




Arundo donax
Arundo donax
(giantreed)
Plants
Exotic

Copyright Info
Arundo donax L.

Common name: giantreed

Synonyms and Other Names: Arundo bifaria Retz., Arundo glauca Bubani, Arundo latifolia Salisb., Arundo sativa Lam., Cynodon donax (L.) Raspail, Donax arundinaceus P. Beauv., Donax donax (L.) Ash. & Graebn., Scolochloa arundinacea (P. Beauv.) Mert. & Koch, Scolochloa donax (L.) Gaudin, Arundo donax var. angustifolia Döll, Arundo donax var. lanceolata Döll

Giant cane, bamboo reed, giant reed grass, Arundo grass, donax cane, bamboo cane (Oakins 2001)

Taxonomy: available through www.itis.govITIS logo

Identification: Arundo donax is perennial and one of the largest herbaceous grasses ranging from 2-8 m in height. It is tall, erect, and cane/reed-like in appearance. Rootstocks are fleshy, nearly bulbous, compact masses which extend to tough fibrous roots that penetrate deep into the soil.
Hollow stems range in diameter from 1 to 4 cm and frequently branch in the second year of growth. Stems are hollow with 2-7mm thick walls which are divided by partitions at nodes, the nodes varying in length from 12-30 cm. The outer tissue of the stem is hard and brittle with a smooth glossy surface. This surface turns pale golden yellow when the stem is fully mature.  Leaves are broad at the base and taper to a fine point. They emerge from the stem on opposite sides and are 5-8 cm in length. Leaf sheaths are tightly wrapped around the stem and commonly persist after leaves have fallen. Flowers form terminally and are plume-like panicles 30-60 cm long (Perdue 1958).

Stems: monocotyledonous structure (Perdue, R.E. 1958); Hollow, segmented clums, 1-4cm in diameter (Oakins 2001)


Flower: panicle, large and plume-like (Bell 1997)


Roots: fiberous, grow up to 5m in depth; Rhizomes (Oakins 2001)

Size: Up to 6-10m in height (Lambert et al 2010; Oakins 2001; Rieger and Kreager, 1989)

Native Range: Origin is unknown (Pilu et al 2012). This species is believed to be from the Mediterranean (Oakins 2001), but it is also thought that it was introduced to the Mediterranean from Asia or India (Bell 1997; Oakins 2001).

Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) Explained
Interactive maps: Point Distribution Maps

Nonindigenous Occurrences:

Table 1. States with nonindigenous occurrences, the earliest and latest observations in each state, and the tally and names of HUCs with observations†. Names and dates are hyperlinked to their relevant specimen records. The list of references for all nonindigenous occurrences of Arundo donax are found here.

StateFirst ObservedLast ObservedTotal HUCs with observations†HUCs with observations†
AZ200920182Little Colorado Headwaters; Rillito
CA201320182Salinas; San Francisco Coastal South
DC193819381Middle Potomac-Anacostia-Occoquan
FL201320131St. Andrew-St. Joseph Bays
HI200220111Kauai
MD193119592Patuxent; Pokomoke-Western Lower Delmarva
MI201320162Manistee; Pere Marquette-White
NV201420174Havasu-Mohave Lakes; Las Vegas Wash; Meadow Valley Wash; Upper Amargosa
NJ189018901Hackensack-Passaic
NM189518951Mimbres
NC193319331Upper Yadkin
OH202220221Ottawa-Stony
TX1852202394Alamito; Aransas; Aransas Bay; Austin-Travis Lakes; Black Hills-Fresno; Blue-China; Bois D'arc-Island; Buchanan-Lyndon B. Johnson Lakes; Buffalo-San Jacinto; Caddo Lake; Chambers; Cibolo; Cowhouse; Denton; East Fork Trinity; East Galveston Bay; East Matagorda Bay; East San Antonio Bay; Elm Fork Trinity; Elm-Sycamore; Farmers-Mud; Hubbard; Jim Ned; Johnson Draw; Lake Fork; Lampasas; Lavaca; Leon; Little; Little Cypress; Little Wichita; Llano; Lower Angelina; Lower Brazos; Lower Brazos-Little Brazos; Lower Colorado-Cummins; Lower Guadalupe; Lower Neches; Lower Nueces; Lower Rio Grande; Lower Sabine; Lower San Antonio; Lower Trinity; Lower Trinity-Kickapoo; Lower Trinity-Tehuacana; Lower West Fork Trinity; Medina; Middle Brazos-Lake Whitney; Middle Brazos-Millers; Middle Brazos-Palo Pinto; Middle Canadian-Spring; Middle Colorado; Middle Guadalupe; Middle Neches; Middle Sabine; Mission; Monument-Seminole Draws; Navasota; Navidad; North Bosque; North Corpus Christi Bay; Paint; Pecan Bayou; Pedernales; Richland; Rio Grande-Fort Quitman; Sabine Lake; Salt Basin; San Ambrosia-Santa Isabel; San Bernard; San Gabriel; San Marcos; San Saba; South Corpus Christi Bay; South Laguna Madre; South Llano; Spring; Sulphur Headwaters; Toyah; Upper Clear Fork Brazos; Upper Frio; Upper Guadalupe; Upper Neches; Upper Sabine; Upper San Antonio; Upper Trinity; Upper West Fork Trinity; Village; West Fork San Jacinto; West Galveston Bay; West Matagorda Bay; White Oak Bayou; Wichita; Yegua

Table last updated 1/12/2026

† Populations may not be currently present.


Ecology:

Habitat:

The most suitable conditions for Arundo donax are well-drained soils with abundant moisture, but can grow in heavy clay, loose sand, and gravel soils. Its preferred environment is along the border of lakes or along ditches and canals. Arundo donax exhibits low tolerance of soils with calcium carbonate (Perdue 1958). When growing in low-nitrogen conditions the buds of the rhizome are produced at a greater distance apart and the underground structures are greatly expanded.  Established plants are tolerant of both drought and flooding as a result of coarse drought-resistant rhizomes and deep penetrating roots.

Paramter description Numeric value Reference
pH range 4.8 - 7.0 Perdue 1958
Annual precipitation requirement (cm) 87.5 - 162.5 Perdue 1958
Nitrogen tolerance (mg/L N) 4 - 16 Liao et al. 2017
Phosphorus tolerance (mg/L P) 0.4 - 3.2 Liao et al. 2017
Salinity torelance (ds m-1) 42 Nackley and Kim 2014
Cold Hardiness scale score 5 MN Dept. of Ag. 2025
Minimum temperature tolerance (°C) -13.88 USDA 2017
Minimum light tolerance (% of full sunlight) 10 Spencer et al. 2005
Minimum frost free days per year (days) 220 Perdue 1958; USDA 2017

Life history:

The primary mode of reproduction for Arundo donax is vegetative, which is the most common method used for cultivation. Sprouts rise from disturbed stems or rhizomes even if buried 3 to 10 feet deep (USDA Forest Service 2014). Stems and rhizomes remain viable for at least one month upon separation from the parent plant (Wijte et al. 2005). Little is known of seed production. Where Arundo is non-native or invasive, plants reportedly do not produce viable seeds, and stands are genetically uniform. In its native range, particularly in Asia, A. donax is very fertile, with morphological and genetic polymorphy (Jimenéz-Ruiz et al. 2021). Some plants have been grown using seeds collected in Afghanistan, Baluchistan and Iran. Dense seed heads at the top of tall stems are assumed to be used for wind seed dispersal (Perdue 1958). Active growth occurs in the spring, summer, and fall and flowers bloom in late spring (USDA 2017). Recently, mechanical controls such as mowing have been attributed to the spread of Arundo donax thanks to stem fragmentation (Calazans et al. 2023). At favorable conditions canes grow at 0.3 to 0.7 m per week over several months and more than 20 tons per hectare of above-ground dry mass can be produced.

Means of Introduction: This species was brought into California by colonists intentionally from the Mediterranean in the mid-1800s for thacthing roofs and the mistaken belief that it would control erosion in ditches (Hoshovsky 1987, Bell 1997, Herrera and Dudley 2003).

Arundo donax was widely cultivated in France for the producing musical instruments. During World War I, troops in France used most of the canes of A. donax for building shelter and for fuel, which created a shortage for instrument makers; as a result, the plant was cultivated in California, Texas, Alabama, and Georgia in an attempt to replace the resource (Perdue, R.E. 1958).

Status: Established through much of the western United States.

Impact of Introduction:
Summary of species impacts derived from literature review. Click on an icon to find out more...

EcologicalEconomicHuman HealthOther




The invasion success of Arundo donax is due largely to its rhizomal spread, rapid growth, and tolerance of a variety of flood and drought conditions as well as climatic conditions (Quinn and Holt, 2008). This species creates dense, monoculture stands, outcompeting native species for space and resources (Quinn and Holt, 2008). This species has had many human uses, including use for building instruments, building shelter, for fuel, and for medicinal purposes (Perdue 1958; Oakins 2001). It has also been used to control erosion in irrigation canals (Oakins 2001). This species reduces arthropod abundance and diversity; it is thought that the species may impact trophic cascades that extend to migratory songbirds (Herrera and Dudley, 2003).

Remarks: This species is included in the list of the world’s 100 worst alien species (Lowe et 2000).

Listed as caution species by Indiana Invasive Species Council indicating incomplete assessment but potential for invasion and impacts.

References: (click for full references)

Bell GP (1997). Ecology and management of Arundo donax, and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in southern California. In: Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe.

Boose AB, Holt JS (1999). Environmental effects on asexual reproduction in Arundo donax. Weed Res. 39: 117-127.

Everitt JH, Yang C, Alaniz MA, Davis MR, Nibling FL, Deloach CJ (2004). Canopy Spectra of Giant Reed and Associated Vegetation. J. Range Manage. 57: 561-569

Herrera, A.M., and T.L. Dudley. 2003. Reduction of riparian arthropod abundance and diversity as a consequence of giant reed (Arundo donax) invasion. Biological Invasions, 5(3), 167-177. Biological Invasions 5(3):167-177.

Lambert, A.M., T.L. Dudley, and K. Saltonstall. 2010. Ecology and Impacts of the Large-Statured Invasive Grasses Arundo donax and Phragmites australis in North America. Invasive Plant Science and Management 3(4):489-494.

Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S.,De Poorter M. 2000. 100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species: A selection from the gobal invasive species database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN,. www.issg.org/booklet.pdf).

Pilu, R., F.C. Badone, L. Michela. 2012. Giant reed (Arundo donax L.): A weed plant or a promising energy crop? African Journal of Biotechnology 11(38):9163-9174.

Oakins, A.J., 2001. An assessment and management protocol for Arundo donax in the Salinas Valley Watershed.

Perdue, R.E. 1958. Arundo donax - source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Economic Bot. 12: 368-404.

Quinn LD, Holt JS (2008). Ecological Correlates of Invasion by Arundo donax in Three Southern California Riparian Habitats. Biol. Inv. 10: 591-601.

Spencer DF, Ksander GG, Whitehand LC (2005). Spatial and Temporal Variation in RGR and Leaf Quality of a Clonal Riparian Plant: Arundo donax. Aquat. Bot. 81: 27-36.

Global Invasive Species Database Profile

Author: Morningstar, C.R., K. Hopper, and A.S. Mulligan

Revision Date: 1/5/2026

Citation Information:
Morningstar, C.R., K. Hopper, and A.S. Mulligan, 2026, Arundo donax L.: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=3595, Revision Date: 1/5/2026, Access Date: 1/12/2026

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.

Disclaimer:

The data represented on this site vary in accuracy, scale, completeness, extent of coverage and origin. It is the user's responsibility to use these data consistent with their intended purpose and within stated limitations. We highly recommend reviewing metadata files prior to interpreting these data.

Citation information: U.S. Geological Survey. [2026]. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida. Accessed [1/12/2026].

Contact us if you are using data from this site for a publication to make sure the data are being used appropriately and for potential co-authorship if warranted.

For general information and questions about the database, contact Wesley Daniel. For problems and technical issues, contact Matthew Neilson.