Lythrurus ardens
Lythrurus ardens
(Rosefin Shiner)
Native Transplant
Translate this page with Google
Français Deutsch Español Português Russian Italiano Japanese

Copyright Info
Lythrurus ardens (Cope, 1868)

Common name: Rosefin Shiner

Taxonomy: available through www.itis.govITIS logo

Identification: Page and Burr (1991); Etnier and Starnes (1993); Jenkins and Burkhead (1994); another commonly used name is Notropis ardens. Snelson (1990) recognized two subspecies, L. a. ardens and L. a. fasciolaris. Dimmick et al. (1996) recognized L. ardens as a species complex; as part of a re-evaluation, they elevated L. a. fasciolaris to species status, and resurrected L. matutinus from synonymy. Mayden et al. (1992) and Gilbert (1998) treated all three species as valid.

Size: 8.5 cm.

Native Range: Atlantic Slope from York River drainage (where probably introduced), Virginia, to the Cape Fear drainage, North Carolina, and in several drainages of the Ohio basin in Virginia and West Virginia (Snelson 1990; Jenkins and Burkhead 1994).

US auto-generated map Legend USGS Logo
Alaska auto-generated map
Hawaii auto-generated map
Caribbean auto-generated map
Puerto Rico &
Virgin Islands
Guam auto-generated map
Guam Saipan
Native range data for this species provided in part by NatureServe NS logo
Interactive maps: Point Distribution Maps

Nonindigenous Occurrences: It is known from the North and South Anna river systems (York River drainage), Virginia (Hocutt et al. 1986; Snelson 1990; Jenkins and Burkhead 1994; Dimmick et al. 1996). Hocutt et al. (1986) listed this species as probably introduced into the Potomac drainage.

Means of Introduction: Unknown; probable bait bucket release. In Virginia, it was first discovered in the South Anna system (Deep Creek) of the York River drainage in 1968, and probably later spread into the North Anna system where it was first discovered in 1979; the species is presumed to have come from an adjacent portion of the James River drainage (Snelson 1990; Jenkins and Burkhead 1994).

Status: Established in Virginia.

Impact of Introduction: Unknown.

Remarks: In their taxonomic revision, Dimmick et al. (1996) recognized three distinct species in the L. ardens complex and they restricted the range of each of the species. Based on the distribution map given by Dimmick et al. (1996) for the three species, we can assume that records from the Muskingum River drainage, Ohio, represent Lythrurus fasciolaris, those from the York drainage, Virginia, are the true L. ardens, and those found in the Cape Fear drainage likely represent L. matutinus. However, among the L. ardens complex, Dimmick et al. (1996) apparently only recognized populations found in the York River drainage of Virginia as introduced. Snelson (1990) provided details on the distribution of native and introduced populations. Stauffer et al. (1978) and Hocutt et al. (1986) listed this species as probably introduced into the Potomac drainage. However, Stauffer et al. (1978) indicated that it could feasibly be native to that drainage.

Other Resources:
FishBase Summary

Author: Leo Nico, and Pam Fuller

Revision Date: 8/29/2013

Peer Review Date: 4/1/2016

Citation Information:
Leo Nico, and Pam Fuller, 2018, Lythrurus ardens (Cope, 1868): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL,, Revision Date: 8/29/2013, Peer Review Date: 4/1/2016, Access Date: 1/20/2018

This information is preliminary or provisional and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information has not received final approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and is provided on the condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logoU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information: Pam Fuller - NAS Program (
Page Last Modified: Thursday, December 21, 2017


The data represented on this site vary in accuracy, scale, completeness, extent of coverage and origin. It is the user's responsibility to use these data consistent with their intended purpose and within stated limitations. We highly recommend reviewing metadata files prior to interpreting these data.

Citation information: U.S. Geological Survey. [2018]. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida. Accessed [1/20/2018].

Additional information for authors